Disagree strongly. While there are a very, very few people that are mature, intelligent, educated adults that don't have formal education, that number is becoming vanishingly small in the modern world, given the incentives involved. I can't imagine finding much common ground with someone that doesn't have at least a bachelor's, and I don't think I'd be likely to be especially compatible with someone that doesn't have an M.S., professional degree, or doctorate.
There's no reason that someone couldn't be intelligent, motivated, have their shit together, and not fit that criterion, but in practice, damned near everyone that I'd be interested in will have a Master's degree or higher.
Ewww, at least pick a decent cocktail.
Technological growth will only outpaced it in the developed world, however it will impact the developing world so much there will be a mass exodus. which then causes the same to happen in the developed world, a new dark age rises and the world powers are redistributed!
Also, so what you mean is someone with the same areas of interest as you, regardless of having a college degree, theres a lot of different areas and she might find your interests dull as hell
or might have little in the way of formal education but a lot in self-taught and interests.
Yeah, but it was wrong. As was all the other things I listed. It's true that a flat earth was their best scientific explanation at that time, but science gets better and changes it's explanations for things. Just like we've changed the age of consent when we've acquired a better understanding of how humans develop.
Sure, our eating habit might be more off now than back in the days, but that's because of other reasons. You can still eat way more healthy today than you could back then, because we have a broader sortiment of food and a better understanding of nutriment in general. So that's not that our understanding is lacking, that's just people chosing hedonistic pleasure over healthiness.
That sounds like a good change. Don't see how it's relevant though. The chain of logic was that your claim that people were happier before wasn't valid because your evidence only claimed that people were happier 30 years ago. Says nothing about 300 years ago, or longer.
Don't really hate them, but I consider them unenlightened. The world has progressively become a better place to live in because we learn more all the time, and if people change something (such as the age of consent) it's probably for the better untill proven otherwise.
Then we have another spot on where we differ quite a lot again. I don't want kids to vote, to drive, or to make important life decisions just because they hit puberty. I agree with most of the western world in that it's way too early.
You being a Muslim, and me a heavily secular westerner, does explain a lot of our different world views though.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/academic?s=t
noun:
9 a person who is academic in background, attitudes, methods, etc.:
The only evidence you've supported yourself is an irrelevant article about how people were happier 30 years ago. And the only claim you have made is that the age of consent should be at puberty because it used to be, and it was a for a whole lot of years.
How about this, we scratch this entire conversation and make it all based on evidence; since you're the one proposing a change, can you start with supplying evidence that the age of consent would be better at puberty than at 18?
I find pre-25 year old girls (and younger girls in general) to be more fun in conversation than older girls, especially 30+ those girls are super boring and the age starts to show
See the very young girls are actually genuinely into nerd culture from an early age, they grew up playing games etc -- unlike a lot of 30+ year old girls who are basically faking it.
Bear in mind, I know from being in school and uni with the current 30+ girls - they had nothing but disdain for nerd culture at the time, but now that nerd culture is in, it's like "yay we're all gamer girls!"
Last edited by mmoca8403991fd; 2015-09-05 at 03:34 PM.
Ouch. I still remember a girl borrowing a computer game from me, but when I asked it back from her in school she bluntly and stubbornly refused to admit she had it. Actually took me a while to realize that the reason was that she was so afraid to be seen as one who played computer games. Those were different days, lol.
This thread kind of makes me feel better for dating a 17 year old when I was 20. (21 now for reference if it mattered)
I make music https://www.youtube.com/c/AscentToZenith
I am both the Lady of Dusk, Vheliana Nightwing & Dark Priestess of Lust, Loreleî Legace!
~~ ~~
<3 ~ I am also the ever-enticing leader of <The Coven of Dusk Desires> on Moon Guard!
I'm always finding myself super attracted to women 5 - 12 years older than me, don't know why. Maybe by 25 and up they've nailed how to look their best, or maybe it's their maturity that attracts me, but all I know is... I cannot date them.
It just never works out, the thought of them being so much more experienced and ahead of me in life's journey always lingers and nags at my mind and pulls me away. It's a real shame my mind has to do that. Anyways, because of that, I often find myself connecting more closely to girls around my age (usually 1 - 2 years younger), so they're who I primarily try to date.
It's pronounced "Dur-av-ian."
I really did not mean you, you clearly have always been a dedicated gamer and I respect the honesty that comes with that.
I just mean that back in 2004, female gamers were rare. I had plenty of girls in my guild in vanilla wow and they would always explain how separate they felt from other girls, how it took a lot of dedication to go against the flow. (again, it was 2004)
Now all the girls I meet (especially the 30/35+ women who are desperate to be interesting and invite me over to play on their wii) somehow were all hardcore gamers back in 2004, even though the first game they ever played was candy crush or wii tennis.
Last edited by mmoca8403991fd; 2015-09-05 at 05:03 PM.