When i was a kid, whenever i went to see a castle that was still used by royalty, i felt very different about it then when i visited a unused castle.
The vatican and royal palaces were "real", with real guards, and a real chance to catch a glimmer of a real queen or pope or whathave you.
neuschwanstein and stuff like that felt more like a museum.
Heck even the tour guides heavily play on stuff like that. So yeah i'd say royalty can influence tourism to a significant degree. Though admittedly the UK does a hell of a lot better job of it then most other countries. But even for those countires royalty is a handy diplomatic tool.
Last edited by mmoc982b0e8df8; 2015-09-09 at 03:30 PM.
No they weren't. But the English (and the other big European countries of the time) can tell themselves what they need to in order to feel better about things.
Again, not everyone. And I've noticed England hasn't offered to give back any of their ill-gotten gains, as an aside. It's easier to criticize everyone else than own up to one's own faults, I suppose. But hey, at least they oh so generously offered to let Scotland become independent again. In 2015. (Which is a little later than 1920, btw.)It wasn't until like 1920s that people started asking "what the hell are we doing?"