Page 17 of 31 FirstFirst ...
7
15
16
17
18
19
27
... LastLast
  1. #321
    Quote Originally Posted by Palemaster View Post
    The international law is indeed clear. You cannot attack hospitals, unless they're used to harm you.

    From "Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick In Armed Forces In the Field", article 21:

    "A. Acts harmful to the enemy. -The protection to which medical
    establishments and units are entitled cannot cease unless they are used
    to commit acts harmful to the enemy. The wording adopted by the
    Diplomatic Conference of 1949 was intended to make it clear that protection
    could only cease in the one case mentioned above, whereas in
    1929 it had merely been stated that protection would cease if such
    acts were committed."
    US military stated the Taliban was not in the MSF compound. Secondly you can't read legal documents. It says.

    Art. 19. Fixed establishments and mobile medical units of the Medical Service may in no circumstances be attacked, but shall at all times be respected and protected by the Parties to the conflict. Should they fall into the hands of the adverse Party, their personnel shall be free to pursue their duties, as long as the capturing Power has not itself ensured the necessary care of the wounded and sick found in such establishments and units.

    The responsible authorities shall ensure that the said medical establishments and units are, as far as possible, situated in such a manner that attacks against military objectives cannot imperil their safety.

    Art. 20. Hospital ships entitled to the protection of the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea of 12 August 1949, shall not be attacked from the land.

    Art. 21. The protection to which fixed establishments and mobile medical units of the Medical Service are entitled shall not cease unless they are used to commit, outside their humanitarian duties, acts harmful to the enemy. Protection may, however, cease only after a due warning has been given, naming, in all appropriate cases, a reasonable time limit, and after such warning has remained unheeded.

    That is the full text. What does Article 21 state exactly: Protection may, however, cease only after a due warning has been given, naming, in all appropriate cases, a reasonable time limit, and after such warning has remained unheeded.

    Why do you guys blatantly lie so much? Seriously. All three of you have lied about international law to defend your perverse view of killing innocent people.

    If you were Syrian you would be an Assad supporter.
    You can't fix stupid. But damn it you can troll it!

  2. #322
    Quote Originally Posted by Repefe View Post
    If that is the case, somebody should go to jail for that + US should apologize.
    you overestimate the worth of a non-american life in the eyes of the us government
    " In a Society like this table, a state of equilibrium, once one makes the first move, everyone must follow! In every era, this World has been operating by this napkin principle. And the one who ‘takes the napkin first’ must be someone who is respected by all. It’s not that anyone can fulfill this role… Those that are despotic or unworthy will be scorned. And those are the ‘losers"

  3. #323
    http://www.msf.org.uk/article/afghan...duz-airstrikes

    According to the article the hospital did not have any hostile forces, and was specifically targeted for over an hour.

  4. #324
    "The bombing continued for more than 30 minutes after US and Afghan officials were informed of the proximity to the hospital, the charity tweeted."

    With how fast information travels these days, why didn't they fucking stop?

    Goddamnit, this shit really makes me fucking angry.

  5. #325
    What were doctors doing in a Taliban city anyway? (Rhetorical question I know: providing aid to Taliban fighters. The very name of the organization Doctors without Borders sounds like a pan-Arab, global jihad movement that doesn't respect sovereignty of current states and wants to rewrite the borders to form a new Caliphate). Surely that makes them legitimate targets.
    Last edited by ramjb; 2015-10-04 at 03:51 AM.

  6. #326
    Quote Originally Posted by ramjb View Post
    What were doctors doing in a Taliban city anyway? (Rhetorical question I know: providing aid to Taliban fighters). Surely that makes them legitimate targets.
    Speaking to Al Jazeera, Taliban spokesperson Zabiullah Mujahid said that no Taliban fighters were present in the hospital at the time of the air strike.

    "Our mujahedeen (fighters) were not treated at the MSF trauma centre due to prevailing military conditions."

    http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/1...151257396.html

    that hospital had been there for at least 5 years, long before the taliban took the city.

  7. #327
    Quote Originally Posted by ramjb View Post
    What were doctors doing in a Taliban city anyway? (Rhetorical question I know: providing aid to Taliban fighters. The very name of the organization Doctors without Borders sounds like a pan-Arab, global jihad movement that doesn't respect sovereignty of current states and wants to rewrite the borders ). Surely that makes them legitimate targets.
    that is epic level of mental gymnastics, i'm honestly impressed.

  8. #328
    Titan Gumboy's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Lost in Space
    Posts
    11,649
    Quote Originally Posted by Hooked View Post
    Hard to believe it was an accident when we only use precision laser guided missiles and bombs.
    Make fun of Russia for using dumb bombs, literally next day bomb a hospital
    You're a towel.

  9. #329
    I don't believe our soldiers would ever purposely drop bombs on a hospital unless it was riddled with terrorists.

  10. #330
    Mistakes happen. Especially when you are the only country trying to clean up the mess while the others cowardly sit behind you and criticize your every move.

  11. #331
    Quote Originally Posted by Hexian View Post
    Mistakes happen. Especially when you are the only country trying to clean up the mess while the others cowardly sit behind you and criticize your every move.
    Well the USA is in large part responsible for the mess in the first place, so either way it is their problem. Also in the link I gave earlier you will notice it is stated that the hospital has been there for 5 years, is well known by coalition forces, and was the only building hit. That is not something you can call a mistake, a mistake would bombing the whole area and hitting it, not precision targeting a well known hospital.

  12. #332
    Quote Originally Posted by eluan View Post
    Well the USA is in large part responsible for the mess in the first place, so either way it is their problem. Also in the link I gave earlier you will notice it is stated that the hospital has been there for 5 years, is well known by coalition forces, and was the only building hit. That is not something you can call a mistake, a mistake would bombing the whole area and hitting it, not precision targeting a well known hospital.
    The Taliban is responsible for the mess in Afghanistan. We have used kids gloves in that country and our soldiers have paid the price for it.

  13. #333
    Quote Originally Posted by Hooked View Post
    The Taliban is responsible for the mess in Afghanistan. We have used kids gloves in that country and our soldiers have paid the price for it.
    The Taliban which was once funded and supported by the CIA.

    http://blogs.reuters.com/global/2009...-want-to-know/

  14. #334
    Quote Originally Posted by Hif View Post
    That is the full text. What does Article 21 state exactly: Protection may, however, cease only after a due warning has been given, naming, in all appropriate cases, a reasonable time limit, and after such warning has remained unheeded.

    Why do you guys blatantly lie so much? Seriously. All three of you have lied about international law to defend your perverse view of killing innocent people.
    Actually, This is the full text.
    A small paragraph from the end of article 21: "As we have seen, a time limit is to be named in all appropriate cases. There might obviously be cases where no time limit could be allowed. Suppose, for example, that a body of troops approaching a hospital were met by heavy fire from every window. Fire would be returned without delay."

    That's why Maybach (the liar) said that he's waiting to hear what actually happened. There is no black and white in war. Do you think that if you put on a vest with a red cross on it you're free to launch missiles or shoot anyone you see and that your vest makes you immune? Grow up.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hif View Post
    If you were Syrian you would be an Assad supporter.
    I guess that makes you a big mouth who uploads pictures of himself with an AK-47 looking like a badass, and running to Germany with his tail between his legs after getting his ass kicked.

  15. #335
    Legendary! TirielWoW's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    6,616
    Quote Originally Posted by Furitrix View Post
    Why exactly is the US still bombing Afghanistan?
    I believe the Taliban reclaimed some cities/areas, and that is why they are currently conducting air strikes.
    Tiriél US-Stormrage

    Signature by Shyama

  16. #336
    Quote Originally Posted by Palemaster View Post
    Actually, This is the full text.
    A small paragraph from the end of article 21: "As we have seen, a time limit is to be named in all appropriate cases. There might obviously be cases where no time limit could be allowed. Suppose, for example, that a body of troops approaching a hospital were met by heavy fire from every window. Fire would be returned without delay."

    That's why Maybach (the liar) said that he's waiting to hear what actually happened. There is no black and white in war. Do you think that if you put on a vest with a red cross on it you're free to launch missiles or shoot anyone you see and that your vest makes you immune? Grow up.



    I guess that makes you a big mouth who uploads pictures of himself with an AK-47 looking like a badass, and running to Germany with his tail between his legs after getting his ass kicked.
    Why are you linking a commentary? That is not the convention. More importantly it has no legal value. The convention is very clear.

    The commentary is the opinion of the 5 individuals who wrote it. It isnt the original legal text.

    Feel free to google it. Or you are purposely providing incorrect information to meet your agenda.

    Oh yes also MSF said there were no Taliban there. Now are you going to say MSF is lying.

    I rather get my ass kicked then justify the murder of children. That is what the Taliban do.
    You can't fix stupid. But damn it you can troll it!

  17. #337
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Hooked View Post
    The Taliban is responsible for the mess in Afghanistan. We have used kids gloves in that country and our soldiers have paid the price for it.
    But the taliban was only ever a problem because the US funded and armed them.

  18. #338
    it was the only hospital of its kind in the region, they very often updated the army of their location and not to target them. they even sent messages during the bombing that they were bombing the hospital. the bombing wasnt a "stray hit", it was prolonged and went for more than half an hour.

    These people spent years training and becoming skilled in their craft. its horrifying for any medic or doctor to lose their lives because this means hundreds of lives left unsaved in the future for every one medic dead.

  19. #339
    Quote Originally Posted by Hexian View Post
    Mistakes happen. Especially when you are the only country trying to clean up the mess while the others cowardly sit behind you and criticize your every move.
    Hey according to the guardian article two things happened that imply this is not a mistake:

    a) The hospital informed right away the Afghan and US authorities about the incident and
    b) USA was bombing the hospital for 30 minutes. (MSF: bombing continued for 30 minutes after warning)

    MSF claimed the GPS coordinates of the hospital were widely circulated to all parties fighting in the conflict, and denied reports that Taliban fighters were using the facility as cover while they battled Afghan and American forces. The charity also alleged the bombing continued for up to 30 minutes after it raised the alarm with US and Afghan officials.

    There needs to be a criminal investigation for this.

  20. #340
    I am Murloc! DrMcNinja's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Apparently somewhere whipping Portuguese prisoners
    Posts
    5,697
    Will probably be labeled as "collateral damage" and then they'll go for a cheeky nandos and forget this ever happened.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •