The vileness of SJW reaches new heights

[Deleted]

LGBTP is the new buzzword. Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Trans and Pedo.

[khalltusk]

no most of the people in the thread are just throwing ad hominem and insults at each other and using numerous logical fallacies. this entire thread is a joke.

- - - Updated - - -



well technically inanimate objects can't consent either....

So? They are not living breathing creatures, like humans or animals. So consent does not come into it. Otherwise people using dildos are doing crime. You should full well know this, I suspect you were making a joke or sarcastic comment. If you were serious I do worry for you.

[Deleted]

LGBTP is the new buzzword. Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Trans and Pedo.

Wait what, LGBTP - this isn't a thing, is it?

The goalposts are just moving so fast on the internet.

[khalltusk]

Wait what, LGBTP - this isn't a thing, is it?

The goalposts are just moving so fast on the internet.

No its some scare monger trying to make it out as if Gay and trans and pedophiles are all in some club.

Straight, Gay/Lesbian and pedophiles all have different sexual orientations. However while Gay/Lesbian sexual orientations were not accepted before they are now on a whole more accepted. Thats down to consent. Its between two adults. So they had a legitimate case for being recognized in Law. Pedophiles will never have that and SHOULD never have that. Children cannot consent and generally either do not know whats going on or are too scared to talk about it.

I am all for pedophiles getting help, but they should not be allowed to live near parks or work with kids ever full stop. Thats assuming they are known pedophiles. If they have hurt children obviously its jail time.

So I would not worry much Xarim, its just some scare mongers making that shit up.

[Noradin]

Wait what, LGBTP - this isn't a thing, is it?

The goalposts are just moving so fast on the internet.

Need to get rid of that stupid conglomerate of letters anyway, the english (the speakers of the language) and their fondness of arconyms can get out of hand.
It is time to coin a proper word for it instead of a listing of all constituents that might or might not be part of it depending on whom oyu ask and when.

[buck008]

did a say lock them up no, but not letting them have or keep jobs that put them in a position to be around children yes

Look, I get it, but I can't possibly say this any more clearly. There can be no repercussions for people that have taken precisely zero illegal actions. I get that it makes people want to vomit, but these people, thus far, have done absolutely nothing wrong. You can not punish people for the possibility of doing something horrible later. That's not how the United States works. Nor do I fucking want it to. Ever.

- - - Updated - - -

Wait what, LGBTP - this isn't a thing, is it?

The goalposts are just moving so fast on the internet.

No, the goalposts are at the same place they always were. Punishment comes after the crime.

[Deleted]

we need to kill all heterosexuals is what we need to do

Nah we need to find a cure for the gay.

Infracted

[Dhrizzle]

as what kind of help suppression therapy? wasn't this deemed harmful to homosexuals and why it isn't allowed in many states

Homosexuals have the option to engage in healthy relationships with other consenting adults so the harm of suppression therapy is unnecessary.

Paedophiles don't have that option so learning to suppress their desires may be the least harmful option.

Lol, gawker. The same website who is currently in massive lawsuits for shoddy, biased and plain false reporting. Great sources.

You need to learn to think critically of the media. In a lot of ways Gawker is as trashy as Breitbart and I wouldn't put any faith in either of them reporting "news," but if they quote someone they've interviewed and there isn't a shit-storm from the person involved it's usually a pretty safe bet that they are representing the person's statement properly.

The same website that tried their hardest to hide the fact that their own "journalist" were sleeping with the people they were reporting on and reviewing products, which later turned out to 100% true and caused the massive shitstorm that was gamergate. That gawker, lol, you have no credibility now if you're really going to quote anything that comes from that garbage website.

You're thinking of a different website now, Kotaku and Gawker have the same owners but they have different editors, writers and address. Also the GG narrative you're pedaling is out-of-date, the whole "sex for reviews" thing was debunked by the way Kotaku's writer had never written a review of the game in question, so it became something along the line of "mumble, mumble, COLLUSION, mumble."

[Gheld]

That article makes no sense.

As long as you haven't abused anyone and don't posses child porn, there is nothing authorities can do.

I somehow feel like this is an incorrect statement in a Country that exploded the shit out of an entire country without concrete evidence of any wrongdoing... going entirely on a few people's gut feelings.

[Deleted]

So what's getting discussed now?

[Mistame]

So, to sum up the thread: If you think there's a chance you might have any "unaccepted" attraction, even if you would never act upon it, don't tell anyone. Because apparently an orientation is only an orientation if other people accept is as such.

[Jotaux]

Doesn't it just make sense to encourage pedophiles to get some help and put some effort into figuring out how to address the issue before they possibly molest some kid? I mean you can think they are disgusting and vile all you want but its just going to keep them from seeking help and really makes things worse.

[unbound]

What does this shit have to do with SJW?

Is everything odd that you find on the internet SJW stuff to you?

Take off the SJW glasses, get off the internet, go outside and get a life. The only SJWs I have ever met in real life have all been MRAs. Everyone else lives in the real world.

[Huehuecoyotl]

So according to some of the geniuses on this thread, if you ever have a feeling that you want to kill someone, but don't, that is exactly the same as killing them. You had the feeling, therefore you are a murderer. You should hand yourself in to the police and await execution.

Personally, I feel pity for someone who has ended up being sexually attracted only to children, but has never done anything. They either have to accept being alone for the rest of their lives, or end up in a relationship with someone that isn't a child for the sake of it. It is a sad thing for human being to face. I never even thought about this before I saw an interview with somebody in this position. So fair play to them for being open about the situation, and helping to educate people as a result.

I still have no sympathy for anyone that acts on those impulses, however. Mess with children and you deserve any punishment that is coming to you, in my opinion.

[Gaexion Ramza Beoulve]

pedophiles

I don't see the issue.

Careful Icarus.

[Vyxn]

Look, I get it, but I can't possibly say this any more clearly. There can be no repercussions for people that have taken precisely zero illegal actions. I get that it makes people want to vomit, but these people, thus far, have done absolutely nothing wrong. You can not punish people for the possibility of doing something horrible later. That's not how the United States works. Nor do I fucking want it to. Ever.

.

and what are your thoughts on more strict gun control
aren't making guns more burdensome to own. more hoops to jump through. violating ones rights. are you not punishing people for the possibility of doing something horrible later with that gun
isn't this comparable to what you described shouldn't be done to pedophiles

[buck008]

and what are your thoughts on more strict gun control
aren't making guns more burdensome to own. more hoops to jump through. violating ones rights. are you not punishing people for the possibility of doing something horrible later with that gun
isn't this comparable to what you described shouldn't be done to pedophiles

Since "well-regulated" is a literal phrase in the 2nd Amendment, then no, generally speaking. People have a right to be armed, they don't have a right to do whatever they please with weapons. People also have a right to due process. That's the 5th and the 14th Amendments. It's so important, that it got two. You just aren't getting that you want to suspend due process here.

[silvanobi]

it occurred to me to some people posting here don't understand the difference between pedophile and child molester

you can consider a pedophile to be equivalent to a heterosexual or homosexual male or female
you can consider a child molester to be equivalent to a heterosexual or homosexual male or female rapist

[Vyxn]

Since "well-regulated" is a literal phrase in the 2nd Amendment, then no, generally speaking. People have a right to be armed, they don't have a right to do whatever they please with weapons. People also have a right to due process. That's the 5th and the 14th Amendments. It's so important, that it got two. You just aren't getting that you want to suspend due process here.

don't you agree guns should be kept out of the hands of the mentally ill? isn't that a right being taken away because the potential threat of them having access to a gun
no different then banning admitted pedophiles from obtaining or keeping a job with children because the potential threat they pose to those children

- - - Updated - - -

it occurred to me to some people posting here don't understand the difference between pedophile and child molester

you can consider a pedophile to be equivalent to a heterosexual or homosexual male or female
you can consider a child molester to be equivalent to a heterosexual or homosexual male or female rapist

there is one big glaring difference Pedophilia is a mental disorder homosexuality and heterosexuality or both sexual orientations