Nothing to do with practical usage of either scale.
How about 0 being the freezing point of water? It's a lot more intuitive to know whether everything is freezing and slippery outside.The other is that the numbers make for a better sliding scale of temperatures people actually experience, wherein 0 is very cold and 100 is very hot.
Guess what. The temperature goes even down to -40C here during winters. Guess how much is that in F? -40F. Mind blown.Sure, if you're accustomed to Celsius growing up, then -10 and 37 will work just as well, but from a purely intuitive standpoint, it's easier to relate to 0 and 100.
This doesn't really matter, but for everyday use, there's no downside to Fahrenheit.
Fahrenheit is just plain bad. It wasn't even designed in a logical way, it's pretty much completely arbitrary.
- - - Updated - - -
You haven't really understood the function of those institutions if you think that's their day job - drinking beer and wondering the weather.
This is hilarious, do go on! If you think Harvard isn't "all that", you're flatly ignorant about scientific research.
- - - Updated - - -
This is a spectacularly silly argument - if you really think it matters in any meaningful sense, you're thoroughly mistaken. For most people, under most circumstances, there is no meaningful difference between usage of either scale. Many people find Fahrenheit intuitive for temperatures they commonly encounter. The weird defensiveness of Celsius is some sort of weird tribal thing that I just don't get (maybe because I'm American and used to do science for a living, so both scales are comfortable and intuitive for me).
Last edited by yoma; 2015-11-01 at 04:04 PM. Reason: Was beaten to it by Lei Shi.
"It is not wise to judge others based on your own preconceptions or by their appearances."
Is anyone else amused by people insisting that scientists would never use Fahrenheit in a thread which links to NASA using Fahrenheit? I know I am!
Adapt!
Silly argument? Yours is silly. The only place where Fahrenheit might make more sense is a rainforest. Most people don't live in rainforests.
The weird defensiveness of Fahrenheit is some sort of weird tribal thing that the most of the world don't get. That scale is just ridiculously inferior to Celsius in every possible way.The weird defensiveness of Celsius is some sort of weird tribal thing that I just don't get (maybe because I'm American and used to do science for a living, so both scales are comfortable and intuitive for me).
Harvard provides more financial aid than a typical institution by a wide margin. It is free for people that qualify academically and don't have the funds. No one fails to go to Harvard because they don't have tuition money.
I'm sure they'll be deeply upset that you don't think they're a "good school" though.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah, this is what I'm talking about - really, "ridiculously inferior"? It measures the same thing and is easy to interpret for anyone familiar with it. The practical advantages to either is minimal. The only relevant advantage under most circumstances is standardization. Aside from that, it just doesn't matter.
Yeah, so you're super ignorant about how tuition at Harvard works. I just explained it to you, but keep on keeping on!
It's weird that people from places with grossly inferior institutions are so inclined to provide advice about how the top universities in the world should operate though. You think about teaching Apple the right way to make electronics as well!