My personal view is that it is too soon but I still find it funny, it is too soon out of respect for the victims.
But and its a big but, they shoulnd not care about that. Infringing cos of hurt feelings is a no go.
But soon after Mr Xi secured a third term, Apple released a new version of the feature in China, limiting its scope. Now Chinese users of iPhones and other Apple devices are restricted to a 10-minute window when receiving files from people who are not listed as a contact. After 10 minutes, users can only receive files from contacts.
Apple did not explain why the update was first introduced in China, but over the years, the tech giant has been criticised for appeasing Beijing.
A joke can be funny about anything, this one is actually decent. It's dark, yes, but honestly the truth is the people below Sinai likely felt similar to if it were a bombing.
- - - Updated - - -
And that makes you just as bad as they are, if not worse. You're mad at them for being insensitive to death while being insensitive to their deaths.
All life lost is a tragedy and shouldnt be subject to jokes...even less to make some money off of it. Wonder how they would feel if someone made a "satirical" comic about them getting shot down in their office....
But soon after Mr Xi secured a third term, Apple released a new version of the feature in China, limiting its scope. Now Chinese users of iPhones and other Apple devices are restricted to a 10-minute window when receiving files from people who are not listed as a contact. After 10 minutes, users can only receive files from contacts.
Apple did not explain why the update was first introduced in China, but over the years, the tech giant has been criticised for appeasing Beijing.
To be fair I was laughing at the guns enjoying the freedom of speech at their office. The irony was delicious.
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
But soon after Mr Xi secured a third term, Apple released a new version of the feature in China, limiting its scope. Now Chinese users of iPhones and other Apple devices are restricted to a 10-minute window when receiving files from people who are not listed as a contact. After 10 minutes, users can only receive files from contacts.
Apple did not explain why the update was first introduced in China, but over the years, the tech giant has been criticised for appeasing Beijing.
meh I find the joke to be an easy pot shot and nothing else. which Is Hebdo's MO so that shouldn't surprise anyone.
But soon after Mr Xi secured a third term, Apple released a new version of the feature in China, limiting its scope. Now Chinese users of iPhones and other Apple devices are restricted to a 10-minute window when receiving files from people who are not listed as a contact. After 10 minutes, users can only receive files from contacts.
Apple did not explain why the update was first introduced in China, but over the years, the tech giant has been criticised for appeasing Beijing.
Pretty tasteless comic. Thanks for the link from a source that isn't that paper.
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
Tastless and disgusting in my opinion.
Though i disagree with Dimitry Peskov's statement that ''This has nothing to do with democracy or self-expression'' (BBC claims he said this). This is exactly what democracy and self-expression is all about. Charlie Hebdo is well within their rights to publish these images, regardless of the situation.
Patch 1.12, and not one step further!
Yet people sympathized with Charlie Hebdo when their offices got shot up. Tell me again why did the French police bother to stop the vigiliante getting rid of them? They could have saved the world a lot of anguish later on.
They may very well find it funny. Because they aren't laughing at the tragedy. They are laughing at the joke.
If we were laughing at the tragedy, it wouldn't need to be structured as a joke in the first place. Someone would say "200 people died in a plane bombing" and then we'd laugh. But that's not what's happening. A cleverly structured joke is what is eliciting a comedic response.
Let's say the situation was as follows:
There's a well known drone that regularly does bombing runs in a test field. One day, it malfunctions and blows up. "I guess it intensified its bombardments!" (because it blew up, thus acting as a bombardment itself)
Now at this point I've deconstructed the joke, so of course the initial humoristic response it would usually cause is gone. But you get the joke, right? You understand why that may be funny?
Because of the subject matter in the actually joke, some people might find it to be in poor taste. But nobody is laughing at the tragedy, at the dead people.
Another important point to make is that humans don't have the emotional capacity to feel guilty or depressed about every bad thing that they hear about. You don't cry every time a child in Africa dies, even if you're informed that one dies every X minutes. For most people these events are unrelated to them, so it doesn't cause an emotional response. Nor should it.
So get off that ridiculously tall horse of yours and keep your pity to yourself.
I should rephrase that. I realize there's jokes about 9/11. I meant imagine such a joke receiving headlines fresh after the event, and how some people may react to that.
What I meant is that I can understand Russia's point about some people feeling hurt by it/it being insensitive. Though I disagree with most of the rest of what they said.
Last edited by Arewn; 2015-11-06 at 07:32 PM.