But soon after Mr Xi secured a third term, Apple released a new version of the feature in China, limiting its scope. Now Chinese users of iPhones and other Apple devices are restricted to a 10-minute window when receiving files from people who are not listed as a contact. After 10 minutes, users can only receive files from contacts.
Apple did not explain why the update was first introduced in China, but over the years, the tech giant has been criticised for appeasing Beijing.
Unfortunately any guy who slaps his ex for doing this will go to jail. Any girl that does this will get compliments for standing up for herself.
In both cases beating someone up is wrong. In both cases circumstances should be taken into account for the punishment. (or even if not to punish) It is very unfortunate that these differences exist
edit: My point being greatly illustrated by Kim Pentico. The threat of violence is different for men and women? If you mean due to physical differences women are more likely to be on the receiving end, sure. But how on earth does this justify any difference in treatment when it's not just a threat but there has been actual violence?
Acting differently when a man was assaulted by a women instead of a woman assaulted by a man is sexism, plain and simple.
Last edited by mmocd842740b60; 2015-11-11 at 03:07 PM.
the guy is an idiot and lucky for not being on life support
People don't forgive, they forget. - Rust Cohle
But soon after Mr Xi secured a third term, Apple released a new version of the feature in China, limiting its scope. Now Chinese users of iPhones and other Apple devices are restricted to a 10-minute window when receiving files from people who are not listed as a contact. After 10 minutes, users can only receive files from contacts.
Apple did not explain why the update was first introduced in China, but over the years, the tech giant has been criticised for appeasing Beijing.
That's not what she said at all. She said the situation needs to be fully investigated before we jump to conclusions. There's a pretty strong chance that it was domestic violence and there's also a pretty strong chance that the boyfriend in question isn't interested in pursuing charges.
Also from later in the article,
"Any use of violence that's not done in the context of self-defense is not OK," Pentico said, "and people should be held accountable, period."
What they article is trying to express and what Xarim is trying to spin it as are two different things.
Last edited by fengosa; 2015-11-11 at 03:17 PM.
But soon after Mr Xi secured a third term, Apple released a new version of the feature in China, limiting its scope. Now Chinese users of iPhones and other Apple devices are restricted to a 10-minute window when receiving files from people who are not listed as a contact. After 10 minutes, users can only receive files from contacts.
Apple did not explain why the update was first introduced in China, but over the years, the tech giant has been criticised for appeasing Beijing.
Maybe he deserved to get his ass kicked that day and has decided not to press charges accordingly.
No, she went on this wllittle journey about how "It's different when women do it and men are scarier." Loving that equality.
He might not also press charges because of people like you and Kim who don't want to admit this was DV or treat him like shit for "Getting beat up by a girl".
He also blocked her refused to get out of the way.
Here is the full story of what actualy happend:
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2015/10/1...n-ex-boyfriend
100% legit.
Last edited by uxzuigal; 2015-11-11 at 03:17 PM. Reason: Source
Judges have ruled fighters' fists and feed are deadly weapons, so this was assault with a deadly weapon. He should have pressed charges. Rousey obviously wasn't in fear of physical harm from him, so she beat him out of anger. If it were a male fighter beating his girlfriend for similar reasons, he'd get hell thrown at him.
Last edited by dd614; 2015-11-11 at 03:18 PM.
She's a woman, she would never have to worry even if she killed him.
Caitlyn Jenner, killed one man and sent 3 other to the hospital, got praised by feminist everywhere. No charges
also look at that http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/ar...ter-Lloyd.html
Last edited by mmoc4678df31ad; 2015-11-11 at 03:23 PM.
Difficult one really. If it was a one off event and no history of domestic violence... However if it was the other way around the guy would be in jail, regardless of if Rousey wanted to press charges or not.
Problem is she is a trained, professional fighter and very bloody good at it. I love watching her fights and think she's awesome. I do however think she should face some kind of penalty or punishment for it though. Don't boxers punches count as weapons or something?
I don't want her to be forced to give her belt up in some interim period for being banned though.
Suppose ultimately regardless of who she is, she did something wrong and should face punishment for that.
If her bf took nudes without her consent (which it sounds like he did) then he should also face punishment for that.
Sadly not, but the situation is abit different also: A man usualy has the physical superiority to get away anyways, bit more difficult for women to do the same in most cases. But in the case of a superior strong woman blocking a guy from escape, the man would probably be safe. But nothing is guranteed, men rights in DV cases is rather sketchy.
She was under distress and threat of physical injury or one could argue that she was rather easyli, self defense.. he also grabbed the steering wheel of the car, showing behaviour that is rather scary.