the SJW's already took away free speech
The discrepancy between the US and Europe may in part be explained by how Hitler rose to power.
On the subject of free speech,
Hate speech laws should exist, but at times I wonder if term is being misused and applied incorrectly. As I understand it, hate speech should be speech that incite violence. When causal links can be established between the two I think it's justifiable to ban hate speech and enforce it by law.
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
Millennials, females, democrats, non-whites.
We're in an alternate universe full of savages that became fully educated engineers in a month because a dragon saved a racist from getting prosecuted by a panda in a scarf.
You're not to think you are anything special. You're not to think you are as good as we are. You're not to think you are smarter than we are. You're not to convince yourself that you are better than we are. You're not to think you know more than we do. You're not to think you are more important than we are. You're not to think you are good at anything. You're not to laugh at us. You're not to think anyone cares about you. You're not to think you can teach us anything.
Yes, this is what happens when you grow up taking your freedoms for granted. We need to reassert our nation's values in schhols and public discourse more. We need to remind people about the liberal values that made our country great, and what those liberal values actually mean.
In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.
Rephrase the question -
"Are you ok with not being allowed to speak out against a tyrannical government, such as Nazi Germany or Stalin's Russia?"
See if its still 40% then.
All questions like these do is bait the non thinking into giving up their freedoms. When you're told "are you ok with limiting speech offensive to minorities?" if you're not already aware of this discussion, your first thought it is probably picturing some bigot standing next to a woman in a burqa calling her all the names of the day. Of course no one is okay with that. However, if you've actually paid attention to this discussion, you know fine rightly that what is actually being asked is
"Are you ok with stopping people disagreeing with the hyper religious and hyper offended?" To which the answer is a firm NO. You are not allowed to turn the entire world into your 'safe space'.
Too bad their range is of things that are considered offensive has been stretched so far that nobody will take them seriously.
There are already curbs to free speech.
What is needed is a discussion of what free speech exactly is. Is it a privilege conferred to all speech? Is it a process of which one determines whether it is or isn't free speech?
Virginia v. Black for your information reading purpose.
Whoever loves let him flourish. / Let him perish who knows not love. / Let him perish twice who forbids love. - Pompeii
If that number reaches 51% then wouldn't that leave a minority of the population offended by censorship?
I was labeled a racist the other day because a black man told me that black lives matter, and I said ALL lives matter, not just black lives.
when all else fails, read the STICKIES.