While Huckabee is an all around dumb-fuck, I kind of like this sentiment:
Those that are enthusiastic about refugees should be enthusiastic about inviting them into their neighborhoods rather than insisting that those evil bigots must accept them....he went on to say refugees should “end up in the neighborhood where the limousine liberal lives”
I'm all for helping, and our Governor has made our State's intention to do so clear, but I'm not a big fan of letting lower governments get out of things from higher governments just because they don't wanna.
Refugees should go to the communities best capable of supporting them, whatever the election politics of the local party in power might be.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015...-united-states the process
The estimated duration of it seems to vary, I've heard different officials go between 10 months and 2 and a half years. Chances are the 10 months is based on ideal situations ie not having to split attention among thousands of refugees.
The big take away from this, though, is that it is easily the most cumbersome and intensive screening process to go through to get into the US, and really only a viable option if one has absolutely no resources available to use other means.
Not even Huckabee himself believes this. It's hyperbole, nothing more.
The entirety of my point is contained in post #26.
- - - Updated - - -
I didn't know that Comey disagreeing with that statement was the standard.
In regards to the lack of ability to screen applicants only applying to one single aspect of the screening process, well I'd say that's the exact part we're discussing now, isn't? I mean we're not talking about medical exams, here.
- - - Updated - - -
That's all fine and good, but those people are still checked with Homeland Security, and it wouldn't have any impact on people from non waiver program countries.
Hillary Clinton refused last eastern to shake the hand of a black priest because she thought
that could offend Muslims during ramadan.
And yes it is totally made up like the op.
This chain is glorious. Nobody addresses anything the previous poster speaks about, and simply inject new unrelated data, conjectures and/or veiled accusations.
I'll guess I'll honor the trend and question something of my own without consideration for any poster:
don't you guys get tired of talking past each other?.
Would I be correct in assuming this was in the context of ridiculing our foreign policy and the need for global travel alerts, and that it may behoove Americans traveling abroad to know a line or two in case jihadist primitives take over their hotel and will kill them if they can't?