Originally Posted by
Thunderaan
I think it's a fair question, I'm not a pacifist or a leftist, I just wanna know why the US establishment insists on getting rid of Assad, especially with no real viable plan on what to do after.
1. As bad as Assad is, what's coming after him is far worse. At least Assad isn't a jihadist who wants the world living under Sharia law, he's a secular ba'athist. He's a tyrant, yes, but he keeps to himself and doesn't wanna exterminate the infidels or whatever. Religious minorities in Syria were fine when he had full control, now they're being exterminated, extorted or driven out by IS and other rebels.
2. How exactly has Assad harmed, in any tangible way, US interests or threatened its security? He's allied with Iran... okay, so is Russia, they're also allied with several other insane countries, doesn't mean bombing Russia is a good idea.
3. How has toppling ba'athist dictators worked out in other parts of the Muslim world? A fail of legendary proportion. You didn't get freedom, you got more Sharia and more terrorism.
4. Let's be clear, there are no "moderate" (pro-secular pro-democracy) rebels. There are just different shades of Islamic supremacists who want Sharia law and want to kill or subjugate the infidels. We should not be helping them. Period. They're the exact same mentality that flew into the towers.