No response personally.
No response personally.
Nope.
10 chars
You can't fix stupid. But damn it you can troll it!
In some area's I like to think so yes. Others no i'm dumber than a rock or simply don't care.
Probably not. I'm not dumb but I'm not the smartest guy around either.
- "If you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black" - Jo Bodin, BLM supporter
- "I got hairy legs that turn blonde in the sun. The kids used to come up and reach in the pool & rub my leg down so it was straight & watch the hair come back up again. So I learned about roaches, I learned about kids jumping on my lap, and I love kids jumping on my lap...” - Pedo Joe
If I'm sober and well rested yes. Otherwise I'm derptastic.
Nope but people in my school were dumber than average so i stood out as the big fish in a small pond.
Personally I don't think so but I've been told I am. I don't even see a way to measure that besides arbitrary IQ tests or school grades, which mean fuck all for intelligence and only show how well you can retain and then regurgitate information.
But yeah nah I don't think so. I've never felt smarter than my peers
According to some iq test I did some time ago, yes. It was only a part of the real mensa test though, so I don't think it was accurate.
Its hard to say. Too many factors. I am 120 IQ and in Law School, but I am a very oblivious person.
Yes, when my ego kicks in. And yes, in comparison to my family, I do indeed possess above average intelligence within our large circuit.
Compared to the man on the street? I'd be as dumb as a bread.
How do you measure intelligence?
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
When it comes to making hot wings I am. I can wreck your fucking LIFE with my hot wings.
Everything else, I'm pretty mEh.
Overall, I would say I'm above average. Like all things, it depends on the subject.
Your powers are useless on me you silly billy...
You guys keep proving me wrong. Keep it up. Please never change.
With an intelligence-o-meter.
That's the joke. There is none. There is no empirical measure of intelligence (i.e. no intelligence-o-meter) because the very definition of intelligence is the capacity to acquire and apply NEW knowledge. And thus to have empirically studied a particular piece of knowledge it can't be new.
So intelligence is sort of an abstract idea; the ability to surmise that which can't otherwise be known to the individual whose intelligence is in question. Thus any IQ test that you have studied for the score is automatically 0.
So only through intelligence can you surmise that another being has intelligence and what level they have. And I might think you sound smart and somebody else might think you sound stupid.
Not to be mistaken for being knowledged (i.e. to study that which has already been verified through study and experimentation).
The fact is you can take people who have intellectual disabilities and teach them what are otherwise considered advanced concepts through study and discipline. But the likelihood of them figuring out those advanced concepts on their own through their own experience is fairly slim.
I only say this because any intelligent person would never say they're more intelligent. Every intelligent person would keep it to themselves.
Last edited by Jayburner; 2016-01-22 at 09:57 PM.