Should the us invade and conquer Canada?

[Shadowferal]

Seriously who made this? Look up NATO, this question doesn't even make sense

The question is kinda stupid.
Invading means then we'd have to take care of them, and we can't even do that for ourselves.

[Kretan]

Oh I think physically they could do it, but the repercussions would be insane.

[Lorgar Aurelian]

I don't understand why US, Canada and Mexico just don't become a supernation? We could adapt Canada's social policies, mexicos uhhh infrastructure? And the US economy.

as some one looking in at america from Canada it seems like it has so many problems that Canada wouldn't want to join up with it i mean mexico i could see but canada is doing pretty good on its own we don't really need the us

[Friendlyimmolation]

Didn't they try this once before and get their asses kicked?

not to take this thread seriously, but The U.S. Army has redic size and spending compared to canada, its hard to base an invasion on pass events when things have changed so much.

But no, why lose a friend in Canada?

[EventHorizon]

Why the hell would we want Canadia?

Gee I don't know at all..... oh wait:

- Oil
- Pure water
- vast amount of land unoccupied or undeveloped due to climate. Access to high polar territories to fend off Russia
- Ridiculous amounts of energy production due to hydro/oleo/aero/geothermal and some nuclear. Expansion of hydro would be simple - if negative environmentally and could generate several hundred more GW.
- etc...

That is why we should only look at impoverished Eastern European, Southeast Asian and Central African countries to conquer .

Exactly .... :| wait this is really happening.

Didn't they try this once before and get their asses kicked?

I'm pretty sure you're joking but... things changed in 204 years. A lot.

[Independent voter]

Bernie would win Canada, except for Alberta. Alberta is Trump country.

[Lartok]

Maybe, but boycotting the U.S. would also cripple the boycotters

Yeah because everyone's economies will be crippled with out all of the products that the U.S produces, such as:
1) TV and Movies
...

[Xargoth6634]

US would probably lose

Lolwut? Are you even serious?

[Belize]

The U.S. would get it's ass whooped by the mounted police.

[Lightwysh]

as some one looking in at america from Canada it seems like it has so many problems that Canada wouldn't want to join up with it i mean mexico i could see but canada is doing pretty good on its own we don't really need the us

Our problems stem from shit social policies. That's why we would put Canada in charge of that.

[Dug]

Our guns would get all jammed up with the frozen maple syrup

[satimy]

The question is kinda stupid.
Invading means then we'd have to take care of them, and we can't even do that for ourselves.

Why wouldn't we just kill them all and take their shit? If you're annexing Canada I doubt you care about Geneva

[EventHorizon]

Our problems stem from shit social policies. That's why we would put Canada in charge of that.

And now that Harper is out of the off- Oh shit..... VOTE CONSERVATIVE, FAST!

Our guns would get all jammed up with the frozen maple syrup

I don't know what you do with your guns and I don't want to kink shame but there are easier ways to tap a maple tree.

[satimy]

Yeah because everyone's economies will be crippled with out all of the products that the U.S produces, such as:
1) TV and Movies
...

Not what we produce, what we buy and consume

[Zarc]

This is a weird topic of discussion in so many ways. The first way is that you ask two entirely different questions; in the title of the thread you ask if the US should invade and conquer Canada, then in the poll you ask if they could do that. Two very different things. The second way is that you ask a completely irrelevant question as the US would never ever invade Canada... the US is a liberal democracy, so is Canada. Due to that fact the US would never invade Canada. The people would not allow any Commander-in-Chief to do that. So.. should they? No. Could they? Of course.

[Deleted]

Not what we produce, what we buy and consume

The American people will not last long without their comforts and luxuries, that which the USA now exports would be replaced by other countries quick enough. The US Military will win the battles but not the war, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan show what happens when a war gets unpopular with the voters.

[Kalis]

The American people will not last long without their comforts and luxuries, that which the USA now exports would be replaced by other countries quick enough. The US Military will win the battles but not the war, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan show what happens when a war gets unpopular with the voters.

The problem I have with your suggestion, is that the US makes up 11% of our export market, but Canada makes up less than 2%, so can we just threaten the US with sanctions but not implement them? Or perhaps take the Yanks' side and impose sanctions on Canada for not being Australia instead?

[Deleted]

Why wouldn't we just kill them all and take their shit? If you're annexing Canada I doubt you care about Geneva

Maybe because it's near to impossible to kill every Canadian at the same time and those that survive the first wave will fight you all the harder?!
They either surrender and you kill them or they fight and might survive till the rest of the world steps on 'Muricas neck. Don't think for a second that the US can win that kind of war.
Oh well, there already have been people like that and we all know how that ended EVERY TIME.

[Independent voter]

Well, the EU would put sanctions on us.

With a free Canada, we have all the benefits of annexing them without actually having to take any responsibility for them.

[BuckSparkles]

US could walk over Canada in a 1v1.

I mean, the US might lose some troops, but Canada. Not a chance.