Thanks for finally coming to that realization! Better late than never.
I guess I'll just leave this here,
Thanks for finally coming to that realization! Better late than never.
I guess I'll just leave this here,
Well hes right.
Most intelligence agencies say around 20% of Muslims are extremists that seems high but even if only 5% of Muslims are extremists out of the 1.6 billion in the world that's still 80,000,000.
Sort of ironic coming from a guy partially responsible for the disaster Europe finds itself.
Sounds like Tony Blair agrees with Trump on this issue.
Considering how violent MANY of them can become... for example, should anyone poke fun at Islam, compared to those making fun of other religions... I can agree to that comment in all honesty. A LOT of them would rather have Sharia Law over their host country's laws... those that came directly from the ME, for the most part, just aren't compatible to the West's ideals.
Oh, but they exploit the West to great lengths, and the PC politicians are more than willing to bend over backwards for them to appease their Muslim voters. And lets face it, they cry over everything that doesn't meet their standards or the Koran.
Compromise does not exist. Many Muslims, mainly those from Muslim countries, have a VERY institutionalized way of thinking with how they've been brought up... and it's because of this that gives rise to incompatibility. I have absolutely zero problems with radical Muslims being dealt with swiftly, and harshly, as they should be... many Imams throughout Europe have been targeting the young generation for them to turn on the West and/or join the likes of ISIS for their "Holy War".
Last edited by Daedius; 2016-03-29 at 01:55 PM.
I would argue that it's not inherently wrong to be bigoted in some circumstances. By all means, we should be entirely intolerant of, and understand the regressive nature of some specific ideals and social/political structures.
As an example...
In many countries, as outlined in this study by Pew Research, the overwhelming majority of Muslims (Generally 75% or higher, with the exception of those polled in Bangladesh) in the polled countries view homosexuality as "morally wrong." That is a belief that is inherently inferior to to even the average Christian American's view on homosexuality (as outlined in this study by Pew Research), which is known to be extremely religiously conservative, relative to the rest of the Western world. The Pew Research study shows that the rate of acceptance of homosexuality by Christians sits at about 54%, with definite positive trends (In contrast to the 83% acceptance rate of the non-religiously affiliated, and the 76% acceptance rate of other religious groups).
To quickly TL;DR, in case the point I was trying to make was obfuscated, bigotry is not inherently wrong in some situations, as the intolerance and outright rejection of - as in my given example - socially regressive ideals by specific groups is not a bad thing to do, for lack of better explanation.
Note:
As I know this will be something that someone points out, I'm going to explicitly state that I'm not saying all Muslims view homosexuality as morally wrong. Nor am I attempting to expand the study's conclusions past its constraints. I'm merely using it as an example of a socially regressive idea that is held by a large number of people.
Sylvanas didn't even win the popular vote, she was elected by an indirect election of representatives. #NotMyWarchief
Given that this whole thread is essentially religion-bashing, I'm locking this here.