Show it all, let the humanity flow...reality is scarier than any fiction.
The sooner we get over this idea that "inhuman/un-natural acts" is a thing...the better.
Anyone saying "I don't want my kids seeing this!" Fine, be an adult...know what your kids are doing, prevent them from watching/consuming certain shows/media/entertainment that offend your "sensibilities" ,ACT LIKE AN ADULT...and do what you said you would do when you committed the act that brought the person into the world.
Good luck with that last part lol
Last edited by enragedgorilla; 2016-05-02 at 03:35 PM.
With some really strange mental gymnastics he tries to point out, that it's hypocritical to do something fictional, without repeating the same in real life. The core thing he doesn't seem to get tho, is that fiction doesn't equal reality, and can't be compared as equal.
Oh, which also means IF his version was true, he's hypocrite for not having his real name as username, instead of fictional one.
Violence is mostly a fantasy unless you're really unlucky.
Boobs are very much real and part of everyone's life unless you're very unlucky.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
Because with rare exception, Blood & Guts in TV shows aren't real.
Its not hypocritical at all.
All the violence shows is fake and staged. Imagine the uproar if they actually showed real violence. Nudity however isnt fake as it would still be an actual real person getting nude.
Besides it really depends on what kind of violence it is too. Making loud gun noises and people dropping down isnt graphic same as comic book level fighting scenes where no one even gets bruises after. You can only compare that kind of violence with maybe showing a guy and a girl under blankets talking, not to graphic nudity.
It's no different than real life where rapists are often regarded as being worse than murderers.
My favorite example is the show Hannibal, where they show peoples throats being cut in graphic detail, but sensor breasts and genitals in classical paintings shown in the background. The argument of nudity being real and violence not is pointless to me, since there is absolutely nothing wrong in sex or nudity. Sex is healthy, ultimately positive thing to do and share with other people. Nudity is the most natural thing and often times has nothing to do with sex, and learning the difference between sex and nudity as well as what a human body looks like could, imo, do nothing but good to the western society. This is coming from a Finn, and the rich sauna culture has thought me a very different view of nudity than the Christian society of America enforces; heck, basically all my core guildies, male and female alike, have seen me naked and I feel absolutely no shame whatsoever about that, and my spouse is completely fine with it too.
Last edited by Cephilia; 2016-05-02 at 04:46 PM.
That's cool. My personal favorite are the people who think real life and video games are the same and that anything we do in game we also should support in real life. When you learn to separate the two, that'll be great.
- - - Updated - - -
Again, you're reinforcing the fact that you can't tell reality and media apart. Stop making an ass of yourself. You've done that for over 5k posts now, take a break.
Except that during the renaissance the art contained a significant portion of nudity - without causing a big problem with Christianity that had more power at the time.
The nudity was not always sex-related, but Michelangelo's David had to be censored when shown in The Simpsons.