...BWAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!! A Billionare casino owner that has bought more elections than others, and who has given the least to charity is the one you actually believe who's "looking out for working people + middle class"!?
Give me a break... it's going to take the next depression caused by Trump to wake some of you out of your delusional states IMO.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh, you know most people?
Last edited by mvaliz; 2016-05-10 at 03:46 AM.
Human progress isn't measured by industry. It's measured by the value you place on a life.
Just, be kind.
Nope - only the zealots like you and Trump who define "National Sovereignty" as "anybody who's not a White Christian die-hard Capitalist". Trump is doing to Musluims and Mexicans (illegal or not, just ask the racists who are voting for him) what Hitler did to the Jews. Pointed to them and say "THEY'RE the reason for bad things! hate them!"
Hmmmm...
"Data from Public Policy Polling show that a third of Mr. Trump’s backers in South Carolina support barring gays and lesbians from entering the country. This is nearly twice the support for this idea (17 percent) among Ted Cruz’s and Marco Rubio’s voters and nearly five times the support of John Kasich’s and Ben Carson’s supporters (7 percent).
Similarly, YouGov data reveal that a third of Mr. Trump’s (and Mr. Cruz’s) backers believe that Japanese internment during World War II was a good idea, while roughly 10 percent of Mr. Rubio’s and Mr. Kasich’s supporters do. Mr. Trump’s coalition is also more likely to disagree with the desegregation of the military (which was ordered in 1948 by Harry Truman) than other candidates’ supporters are.
The P.P.P. poll asked voters if they thought whites were a superior race. Most Republican primary voters in South Carolina — 78 percent — disagreed with this idea (10 percent agreed and 11 percent weren’t sure). But among Mr. Trump’s supporters, only 69 percent disagreed. Mr. Carson’s voters were the most opposed to the notion (99 percent), followed by Mr. Kasich and Mr. Cruz’s supporters at 92 and 89 percent. Mr. Rubio’s backers were close to the average level of disagreement (76 percent).
According to P.P.P., 70 percent of Mr. Trump’s voters in South Carolina wish the Confederate battle flag were still flying on their statehouse grounds. (It was removed last summer less than a month after a mass shooting at a black church in Charleston.) The polling firm says that 38 percent of them wish the South had won the Civil War. Only a quarter of Mr. Rubio’s supporters share that wish, and even fewer of Mr. Kasich’s and Mr. Carson’s do.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/25/up...tolerance.html
Seems like the normal regressives were flocking to Trump. New boss same as the old boss.
What are we gonna do now? Taking off his turban, they said, is this man a Jew?
'Cause they're working for the clampdown
They put up a poster saying we earn more than you!
When we're working for the clampdown
We will teach our twisted speech To the young believers
We will train our blue-eyed men To be young believers
Yeah, I'm not voting for a Republican. Because fuck the religious neo-cons that have hijacked the party. (and fuck neo-cons)
I'm voting for Trump.
Not sure I would call him a liberal though, lol. Trump's pretty solidly a conservative. An actual conservative. Not a neo-con corporate shill like the rest of all the candidates for the last uh 40 years? Excluding Sanders, obviously.
Last edited by mmocb78b025c1c; 2016-05-10 at 04:27 AM.
Uh, considering that ''liberal'' and ''leftists'' are insults in the mouth of Trump supporters....
Trump isn't suddenly left wing just because he agreed with Bernie that Hillary is being controlled.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
lawl, yeah he's all for free speech so long as you say nice things about him. this is a fucking joke of a thread.
Flip flops are one thing, I mean Hillary is pretty much center-left - or center-right if you ask someone outside the US.
But 180s are a separate matter. I think it's what kill Romney's campaign. He was one person during the primaries and a separate person during the election. Who do you believe? What if you believed wrong?
The democrats on the other hand have been pretty consistent in where they stand during the entirety of their campaigns.
Internet forums are more for circlejerking (patting each other on the back) than actual discussion (exchange and analysis of information and points of view). Took me long enough to realise ...
Funnily enough, I got a phone call earlier today that started off with Donald Trump talking, and then another voice talking about how Trump is no longer self funding, and requires emergency campaign donations. With each $10 donation you get a Donald Trump sticker, for those who could donate $500 you'd get an autographed Donald Trump photo. Oh boy!
Harping on illegal immigrants and saying that maybe until ISIS is contained that we should consider not letting Muslims in is racist? I mean hell Sanders flat out has showed racist ideals and was shouted off his own stage by BLM terrorists.
- - - Updated - - -
"White people don't know what it's like to be poor" When are you going to call Sanders a racist since that's far more racist than anything Trump has said.
As long as he builds the wall, kicks out every last illegal and fixes our trade imbalances, I don't care what he does.
Where does racism appear on a political spectrum?
from what i know there are scales between
Franchise, or how much influence voters have and how open voting is.
In the US, nearly everyone can vote, which might make you think it is democratic, but in truth voters have very little franchise, as the 1 decision they get to make is who gets to make every single other decision. When it comes to issues like the TPPA on the other hand, you see a distinct lack of democracy with 0 voter participation.
and the other spectrum is government influence, which ranges from libertarianism (ABSOLUTELY NOT LIBERALISM) to totalitarianism.
If the govt has no influence, then the system is very libertarian, if it is very invasive, like snooping on phone calls, it is totalitarianism.
Snowden leaks show a shift towards totalitarianism, Communism is also very totalitarian while free market capitalism is libertarian, even though many seem to think the opposite and associate Communism with liberalism and think liberalism has anything to do with libertarianism
The scale of racist to not racist doesnt exist on either spectrum, if 'right' wing voters happen to be racists, that has nothing to do with the politics themselves being racist. Also racism is a heavily loaded word that means far too much and far too little, and is at a point where it is simply used as slander against anyone who disagrees with policies that benefit minorities.
Personally i consider racism as hatred directed at a race. I dont consider people who will have african friends but considers most african americans to have bad behaviour as a racist. Unless he universally hates africans based solely on their race then he is not racist, people who make exceptions have other problems, and implying anyone who has a problem with a minority hates everyone from that race is pure ignorance, as it generally has absolutely nothing to do with race despite all appearances.