Not anything that directly effects my side of the country, but this goes deep into California as one of the reasons this was in court in the first place.
A Ninth Circuit three-judge panel has remanded the case of Teixeira vs. Alameda County back to the lower court for reconsideration. What does that mean? As the ruling reads, “the right to purchase and sell firearms is part and parcel of the historically recognized right to keep and bear arms.” Translation: backdoor gun sales prohibitions that feature set-off zones from residential areas are unconstitutional .
Source: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-relea...300269192.htmlA clear case of "some animals are more equal than others" type of gig it seems.Quoting the Supreme Court ruling in SAF's 2010 landmark McDonald case, Judge O'Scannlain reiterated, "The right of law-abiding citizens to keep and to bear arms is not a 'second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees that we have held to be incorporated into the Due Process Clause.'"