Last edited by Zequill; 2016-06-01 at 07:33 PM.
MMO-Champion, once the place to get WoW News, now the home of the haters and their clickbait and doomsaying threads
Which should probably stand as all the more reason to question the zoo's safety measures for the patrons and the gorillas than for people to try and crucify the mother.
If a parent helped them get into the enclosure they should be in jail for abuse...but we don't know that.
I'm not sure you could design an enclosure that allowed people to see the animals that would prevent a toddler/young child from getting inside.
My 18 month old daughter climbed over a gate like this (it's 50" tall) that is in a hallway with smooth walls.
No idea how she got over it, because she can't reach the top and if she pulled it down, it would have been obviously laying on the ground. She's also squeezed through something like this:
The space between the supports is only ~4 inches. I watched her squeeze through it, was T1000 Terminator type shit.
The correct thing to do was to tranq the gorilla, but have deadly force ready to kill if there appears to be additional danger to the child as the tranq takes effect.
I think the reason they were quick to 'pull the trigger' is because of the army of lawyers that would have sued if they tranq'd the gorilla and the child got hurt. Gorillas don't get lawyers so, there you go.
You clearly misread what I said. Animals DEFINITELY serve a role in an ecosystem, however, animals that are extremely endangered are far too few in number to be serving that role while in their endangered state. In other words, that particular animal may as well already be extinct because of how sparse the population is.
I can clearly see that you have a pretty intense belief system regarding human's impact on the environment, but please try and put that aside for a moment and think about my point. Regardless of WHY an animal is endangered, once it is endangered, it isn't serving its role any longer.
My viewpoint is not lacking any education nor is it poorly thought out. However, you have made numerous arguments based on logical fallacies including Post hoc ergo propter hoc when claiming that the shutdown means they did the 'wrong thing'. It could have easily been shut down because of the negative attention the zoo was getting, or it could be because of the poor animal enclosure that allowed that stupid kid to fall in the first place, not their response.
Your arguments are clearly based on your zealous love for animals, which is noble, but out of place in fact-based intelligent discussion.
I think I've had enough of removing avatars today that feature girls covered in semen. Closing.
-Darsithis
No, it wasn't. I made a comment in the context of the given scenario. The logical deduction of that context with my statement was that I would not sacrifice a human life, especially that of a child, to save any number of animal lives. That does not mean that I'd kill all the bees in the world to save a fucking serial killer or any other such garbage. Stop beating dead hors... strawmen.
Finally, some sanity.
Last edited by Mistame; 2016-06-06 at 02:18 AM.
Locking this, since it was necroed from nearly two months ago.