Yet another Timewalking loot post ( As directed by GM)
Opened timewalking Cache before hotfix
Boosting payments.
Did Blizzard just hotfix an ilvl requirement onto Awakened LFR?
MMO-Champion
they change i see 20 000 likes and 80 000 dilikes than i seee 86 likes and 26 dislikes after 1 sec
Recent Blue Posts
Recent Forum Posts
-
2016-06-13, 10:49 AM #1Deleted
why are Hillary Clinton you tube chanel likes and dislikes fake from 800 to 26
Last edited by mmoc1bc8e6de49; 2016-06-13 at 10:52 AM.
-
2016-06-13, 10:54 AM #2Banned
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Wokeville mah dood
- Posts
- 45,475
Well with nothing to go on other than your word... I have no idea.
-
2016-06-13, 10:54 AM #3Deletedhttp://uk.businessinsider.com/clinto...-online-2016-4
Originally Posted by Thepresident
https://www.pastemagazine.com/articl...from-vlad.html
Using a tactic called “astro-turfing,” Clinton surrogates like Brock have attempted to advance the concept of the “Bernie Bro,” and to promote the idea that Sanders supporters are little more than a sexist cult.
The focus of the “digital task force” of paid trolls will be predictable: Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and everywhere else people may come across political messaging.
-
One common reaction to the news is shock—the idea that this is “unprecedented” in American politics. That may be true, but there’s a clear model here, and it comes straight from Russia.
If you haven’t yet read Adrian Chen’s wonderful New York Times Magazine feature “The Agency,” I recommend that you do so now. It’s an incredible look at the “Internet Research Agency,” which employs “hundreds of Russians to post pro-Kremlin propaganda online under fake identities, including on Twitter, in order to create the illusion of a massive army of supporters; it has often been called a “troll farm.””Last edited by mmoca8403991fd; 2016-06-13 at 10:57 AM.
-
2016-06-13, 10:56 AM #4Pandaren Monk
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Brisbane, Straya
- Posts
- 1,813
Google is helping hillary.
Here is a brief video showing some of the stuff google is doing to support her/it/sea hag
(Google owns youtube)
I may not agree with what you say but I will fight to the death to defend your right to say it.
-
2016-06-13, 12:58 PM #5DeletedDebunked already Originally Posted by Bushtuckrman
http://www.theverge.com/2016/6/10/11...illary-clinton
-
2016-06-13, 01:11 PM #6Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Обединени социалистически щати на Америка
- Posts
- 28,394
>Trusting the Verge Originally Posted by Nakloh
lol
-
2016-06-13, 01:13 PM #7Scarab Lord
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Location
- Man Cave Design School
- Posts
- 4,232
Hey now! The Verge is a high quality trustworthy news source ok?! Originally Posted by Gilrak
Gosh."Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.” - General James Mattis
-
2016-06-13, 01:15 PM #8Titan
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 14,596
LOL THE VERGE. Yeah no that's hardly a credible source. Originally Posted by Nakloh
-
2016-06-13, 01:17 PM #9The Undying
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Iowa - Franconia
- Posts
- 31,500
For the same reason the candidates have fake twitter followers.
It's speculated Super Pacs do that kind of crap.
And apparently, as we see with this thread, a few people have enough time on their hand and actually care for such unimportant shit."The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
-
2016-06-13, 01:19 PM #10Special Inquisitor
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 9,755
I typed donald trump into google and it didn't bring up anything about his scam university in the auto complete, clearly google is working for trump too! Originally Posted by Bushtuckrman
Or, its because
http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/10/tech...earch-results/"Our autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person's name," a Google spokeswoman said. "Google autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause. Claims to the contrary simply misunderstand how autocomplete works."Last edited by Moralgy; 2016-06-13 at 01:22 PM.
-
2016-06-13, 01:21 PM #11Warchief
- Join Date
- Dec 2015
- Location
- La Paz, Bolivia
- Posts
- 2,112
http://www.snopes.com/google-manipul...llary-clinton/ Originally Posted by Gilrak
-
2016-06-13, 01:30 PM #12The Undying
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Iowa - Franconia
- Posts
- 31,500
Related and for what it's worth.. Originally Posted by Algy
There is an entire (very high paid) industry out there, dedicated to SEO (Search Engine Optimization).
Businesses are willing to rake out the big bucks to be favored by the search engine's algo's.
That's a market field never out of business, since the search engines change that code all the time.
Now, another fun fact for the conspiracy idiots..
How come a search for Donald Trump on Bing suggests you rather harmless terms.
But a search for Hillary Clinton has a few sensitive terms in the list.
Shouldn't it be the other way around, if the conspiracy holds water?
I mean, after all BING is owned by the alleged Leftwing powerhouse Microsoft.
At the end of the day, some people have way too much time. And if those people are simpletons, then you get conspiracy nonsense."The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
-
2016-06-13, 01:33 PM #13Special Inquisitor
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 9,755
Yea, I came up with nothing negative, either neutral or somewhat positive, when doing the same with Trump on Bing. Clearly a conspiracy is afoot! Originally Posted by Wildtree
-
2016-06-13, 01:34 PM #14Deleted Originally Posted by Gilrak
Hurr let's attack the source, not the argument Originally Posted by ro9ue
https://medium.com/@rhea/hillary-cli...ca1#.3k997qjl8
-
2016-06-13, 01:36 PM #15Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Обединени социалистически щати на Америка
- Posts
- 28,394
Either way, google has shown to be biased before. They blacklist certain sites, like 8chan(4chan remains unharmed), for no good reason.
A search engine blacklisting legal sites can not be trused in my eyes.
- - - Updated - - -
Maybe post a better source next time, but i'm not giving the verge any clicks. Originally Posted by Nakloh
I also don't give a shit about what google does or does not to with Clinton, so what argument was I supposed to argue against?
sLast edited by JohnBrown1917; 2016-06-13 at 01:41 PM.
-
2016-06-13, 01:39 PM #16Immortal
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 7,172
Originally Posted by Thepresident
Because Republicans have been literately trolling the Clintons since the 90s?
-
2016-06-13, 01:39 PM #17Old God
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 10,876
90% of threads on the Off-Topic forum. Originally Posted by Wildtree
-
2016-06-13, 01:45 PM #18Pandaren Monk
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Brisbane, Straya
- Posts
- 1,813
Must've been recent as I used to get 'crooked hillary' on autocomplete a month ago. Originally Posted by Algy
I may not agree with what you say but I will fight to the death to defend your right to say it.
-
2016-06-13, 01:47 PM #19DeletedSorry I don't keep tabs on what websites each user here deems acceptable/biased/libtard/rightwingnut/populistsite/commienetwork/capitalistcapital/literally hitler Originally Posted by Gilrak
-
2016-06-13, 01:50 PM #20Banned
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Wokeville mah dood
- Posts
- 45,475
Always back an argument with a source people are at least "alright" with.
Breibart, dailymail, huffpost all for the most part are ehhhhhhhh verge is kinda in this too. Also anything that sounds like a blog.
Reply With Quote
