Originally Posted by
Nixx
I am saying you are wrong. Sort of.
You are technically correct, but the technically correct answer in this case doesn't really tell the full story. The main point of the ruling is that you can't sue the police simply for being the victim of a crime because that puts police in an impossible to win situation where they'd basically have to divert all funding to paying out settlements. They'd have to be negligent in particular situations. However, in a more common and common sense approach, the responsibility of the police is essentially what people understand it as–to protect and serve.