Originally Posted by
Dracodraco
Pfft I'm a disc priest now I don't know nuffin' bout hunters.
But seriously, the best answer you're going to get is "because it sims better". It's like comparing a car engine to an apple; Huntsmaster gives a higher chance at a proc that results in a DPS / uptime gain, while the ring just gives a flat damage buff. The value of the flat buff outweights the value of the proc, according to sims. There's no easy way to compare the two to each other and point out "this is why X is worse", because they function entirely differently. I personally doubt the ring is actually as strong as is suggested in a real environment, because I have issues seeing the QOL of more dire beast procs being outweighted by a flat 5% damage buff to *just* my main pet. Likewise, the huntsmaster is a lot stronger on AOE than the apex ring, while realistically, they really shouldn't have much of a difference, considering AOE is "just" higher uptime on 3 stack frenzy for the hunts ring (which is usually fairly easy to obtain if you know adds are comming anyway), while the apex ring is a flat 5% buff to your pet and it's cleaves.