They both have their difficulties.
Would you not have a job for those 18 years, if you had no kid?
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
What's the point you're trying to make here exactly? Even if the government doesn't force you to pay child support, you do pay for the upbringing of said child inherently in such a situation regardless. If you don't and neglect the kid, you'll soon find CPS paying a visit.
If you have a child while married, gets a divorce, and moves out without the kid, you'll soon find the government asking you to pay that very same child support you didn't need to before too.
Expert level Trolling, I concede my crown to you and will now abdicate peacefully.
Time to kick up my feet and relacks.
How am i putting words in your mouth?
I'm not saying you said that. I'm pointing out it's hypocritical to have one but not the other.
All your saying now is just deal with the system at hand. It's good on an individual level but policy wise / talking about the system it's irrelevant.
This is something only a mother could answer who has gone thru the child bearing pain and then had to care for them for 18 years. A man might understand the caring for 18 years, but there is no way he can relate to something which is impossible for him to experience. :P