Yes and thats why i wrote the specific part "forcing yourself on a person that is not willing". This part "Det behöver inte heller röra sig om ett samlag utan räcker med "en jämförbar sexuell handling", exempelvis penetrering med främmande föremål, tvång till oralsex eller tvång till beröring av könsorganen"
Googletranslate:
It does not have to move for a sexual intercourse without enough "a comparable sexual act", for example, penetration by foreign objects, forced into oral sex or forced to touch the genitals.
Swedish law says clearly that intention and method is key to how it should be treated.
- - - Updated - - -
Indeed sexualbrott is the real term but Kitty Kits have trouble reading the links he's posting so sometimes making it a bit simpler is needed
Last edited by mmoc44505a06a9; 2016-10-09 at 09:21 PM.
Bolded part is sexual coercion or sexual harassment, not rape. That's a crime separate from rape.
- - - Updated - - -
No, go read court protocols. Legally, there is a difference. It does not say "Sexualbrott" as the type of crime committed. If it's aggravated rape it says "Grov våldtäkt", it does not say rape(Våldtäkt), like you suggest as an umbrella term.
That quote above is from the lawbook. You can take it up with Högsta Förvaltningsdomstolen alternative JK if you don't like the definitions, i'm sure you got the proper qualitications to drive the case.
Kitty Kits this isnt a court protocol its a discussion about a group rape (aka aggravated rape), if this was court you would have lost your licence a few posts ago and gotten kicked out.
Anyway this isnt going anywhere like i said it wouldnt several posts ago and is derailing the thread.
Last edited by mmoc44505a06a9; 2016-10-10 at 07:03 AM.