Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ...
3
4
5
  1. #81
    Quote Originally Posted by Coffeh View Post
    Stalin killed more people than Hitler.
    Is it true Mao killed more than Stalin? Interesting to see the level of fucks dissipate the more communist they are, despite them slaughtering more.

  2. #82
    Banned JohnBrown1917's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Обединени социалистически щати на Америка
    Posts
    28,394
    Quote Originally Posted by Ser Arthur Dayne View Post
    Too bad Stalin didn't have nukes much earlier in the war, would have saved millions of lives in eastern Europe if he made Nazi-Germany glow green. Also, China could have saved millions of lives too had they had it vs Japan.
    I'd rathe not live right next to nuclear fallout, so glad not all of Germany was nuked.


    Not to mention what our economic state would have been like... brrr

  3. #83
    Deleted
    They would nuke Russia first. After that, Britain and after that the US.

  4. #84
    Probably any allied city within range that wasn't already pounded to dirt.

    And certainly also Moscow and Stalingrad etc.

  5. #85
    Elemental Lord
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    8,527
    Quote Originally Posted by Mihalik View Post
    At no point did Germany launch any air raid similar in destructive power to a nuclear weapon on Britain.
    Look up what happened to Coventry, over a kiloton worth of conventional bombs plus over 36,000 incendiary bombs. The damage caused was comparable to the nuclear weapons used against Japan, the only reason the death toll was significantly lower was because we had evacuated our cities and our warning system allowed almost everyone to get to shelters.

    As a note they weren't the only ones who tried to wipe out a city, we dropped over four kilotons worth on Dresden (where the death toll was comparable to Nagasaki).

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Raybourne View Post
    Is it true Mao killed more than Stalin? Interesting to see the level of fucks dissipate the more communist they are, despite them slaughtering more.
    It is, however it's worth noting that Stalin's kills per yer is less than 1/3 of Mao's (and half of Hitler's), and also that the figures for Mao and Stalin are a bit skewed as they get blamed for unpreventable deaths in their country as well as intentional.

    Hitler: 17 mil over 11 years.
    Stalin: 23 mil over 31 years.
    Mao: 78 mil over 33 years.

  6. #86
    Quote Originally Posted by Raybourne View Post
    Is it true Mao killed more than Stalin? Interesting to see the level of fucks dissipate the more communist they are, despite them slaughtering more.
    Yup. In fact I think he killed more than Stalin and Hitler combined. I'll never understand why people think Communism is a good thing. Pseudo-intellectuals like to spout off these massive definitions of the differences between communism, fascism, socialism. At the most basic level they all have the same horrible thing in common: the individual means nothing. When 'the greater good' always trumps an individual you end up with really, really bad results....like millions dead. These 'isms' might appeal to some in theory, but human nature guarantees they will never work. It always ends the same.

  7. #87
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Erin View Post
    Probably manchester, the greatest city in the world and last bastion of freedom against the enemies of democracy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Erin View Post
    Brexit is still fucking stupid, gets stupider by the day, and everyone who voted for it can DIAF.
    Manchester is great though!

  8. #88
    The Insane Aeula's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Nearby, preventing you from fast traveling.
    Posts
    17,415
    Germany? London
    Japan like the article suggests? America, probably Washington DC and New York.

  9. #89
    Deleted
    Depends a lot on at what stage in the war they got the nukes. Realistically they would have gotten them when they were aleady heavily on the defensive, so most likely their first nukes would have been used on the advancing Russian armies out of pure necessity.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •