Teacher accused of sexual contact with student smiles pretty for her mugshot

[Mehrunes]

I mean I wasn't claiming anything, just expressing an opinion to a friend, which wasn't directed towards you, nor did it warrant your response. You do what you want with my opinion, but don't act like I made some massive claim in a heated argument, and refusing to "source" it.

Where have I acted like your claim was massive or that there was an argument of any kind? Celista was wrong to bring her "people BLATANTLY misunderstand age of consent" in this particular thread. It's not like she expressed some great understanding of the Canadian one the last time she brought that narrative up, but at least she had some basis for her behavior there. That's not the case here. Texas' age of consent law is as straightforward as it gets in US. There isn't even a Romeo and Juliet exception to it. And criminalization of teacher/student relationships isn't part of age of consent but a separate issue. The idea that people don't understand the number 17 paints the posters here are abject morons.

And your not-a-claim agreed with her wrong assertion and as such is also wrong despite being a not-a-claim-y opinion. I pointed that out, pointed out that that the teacher in question isn't charged with statutory rape (though Raelbo does have a point in that it's not precise if she actually had sex with the student). And your reply to a post that people don't misunderstand the number 17 and your reply was an implied disagreement (at which point the not-a-claim-ness of your not-a-claim became somewhat questionable, but whatever). But hey, since I have your blessing to do what I want with your opinion, I'll repeat myself and once again point ou that it's wrong and not grounded in observable reality.

[God Save The King]

Where have I acted like your claim was massive or that there was an argument of any kind? Celista was wrong to bring her "people BLATANTLY misunderstand age of consent" in this particular thread. It's not like she expressed some great understanding of the Canadian one the last time she brought that narrative up, but at least she had some basis for her behavior there. That's not the case here. Texas' age of consent law is as straightforward as it gets in US. There isn't even a Romeo and Juliet exception to it. And criminalization of teacher/student relationships isn't part of age of consent but a separate issue. The idea that people don't understand the number 17 paints the posters here are abject morons.

And your not-a-claim agreed with her wrong assertion and as such is also wrong despite being a not-a-claim-y opinion. I pointed that out, pointed out that that the teacher in question isn't charged with statutory rape (though Raelbo does have a point in that it's not precise if she actually had sex with the student). And your reply to a post that people don't misunderstand the number 17 and your reply was an implied disagreement (at which point the not-a-claim-ness of your not-a-claim became somewhat questionable, but whatever). But hey, since I have your blessing to do what I want with your opinion, I'll repeat myself and once again point ou that it's wrong and not grounded in observable reality.

Kk you do that . Not sure why you wrote a book over this lol

[Mormolyce]

The law is there to protect the kids that can't protect themselves. That means the ones that can't go to the authorities (be that fear, coercion or just being convinced by an older person in power that they shouldn't).


But I guess the freedom to fuck kids is more important than protecting the ones that needs protection the most.

These aren't kids. They are over the age of consent and the state has no business telling them who they can and cannot sleep with.

- - - Updated - - -

Well when i 'chaired' a few seminars they told us not to socialise with the students.

You're talking about university/school/etc policies, which commonly have fraternisation rules. This is criminal law. Completely different.

[Protean]

These aren't kids. They are over the age of consent and the state has no business telling them who they can and cannot sleep with.

- - - Updated - - -



You're talking about university/school/etc policies, which commonly have fraternisation rules. This is criminal law. Completely different.

Sounds to me like you don't have the perspective of age yet. We can continue this discussion in 5-10 years time.

[Gandrake]

Sounds to me like you don't have the perspective of age yet. We can continue this discussion in 5-10 years time.

people who aren't teachers fuck 17 year old kids all the time and never get in trouble

i remember climbing into a girls window when i was in my early 20s so i could fuck her and stay the night. i left early in the morning because i was afraid of my car being towed because i parked like a dick and she told me her dad knew someone was there last night because of my imprints in the snow outside so he called the cops and i deleted my messenger account with all of her titty pics and didn't talk to her for about a year until she was 18 and climbed in through her window and we fucked again

its really not a big deal but is obviously unprofessional in her line of work.

[Mormolyce]

Sounds to me like you don't have the perspective of age yet. We can continue this discussion in 5-10 years time.

O... kay. They are literally above Texas' age of consent, that's why we're having this argument in the first place.

I'm 35, for the record.

[yuca247]

This always reminds me of this:

[mickybrighteyes]

Lol if this story was gender swapped we wouldn't be seeing people bring up the nuance of the age of consent laws. Also wouldn't see people say the younger party 'wanted it' as freely.

[Gandrake]

that's probably because banging a hot teacher is a typical teenage boy fantasy and a lot of women who teach children are attractive

men however generally tend to be a lot less attractive in comparison to their female colleagues and people are more suspecting of ulterior motive when a man is involved

Like seriously... I'd have probably fucked 5 of my teachers in high school. But the only decent looking guy on staff was a PE teacher's assistant lol. Everyone else with a dick was either old and/or fat or there was the science teacher who was always doped up on meds.

[mickybrighteyes]

Also would be less assuming of a groups possible fantasies... seriously it's [current year]. Stop pushing what I should or shouldn't [believe/feel/act like] for being [insert]... wait is that the right formula or should I just yell incoherently like Parker and Stone prophesied the masses would do.

[wowaccounttom]

given that she looks bad and fat too, i guess thats considered good looking over there for a teacher.... or for a woman??

anyways, at least she seems to be enjoying it

[Allybeboba]

Read in the local paper paper today that it appears the 17 year old lied about this "affair". It seems she failed him and this is his way to get vengeance.
As soon as she heard there was a warrant out for her arrest she drove down to the police station and turned herself in to the authorities. That would partially explain why she has not been fired yet.

[LMuhlen]

Read in the local paper paper today that it appears the 17 year old lied about this "affair". It seems she failed him and this is way to get vengeance.
As soon as she heard there was a warrant out for here arrest she drove down to the police station and turned herself in to the authorities. That would partially explain why she has not been fired yet.

Plot twist!!

[May90]

She taught him anatomy though, didn't she?

[Gandrake]

given that she looks bad

[RampageBW1]

Read in the local paper paper today that it appears the 17 year old lied about this "affair". It seems she failed him and this is his way to get vengeance.
As soon as she heard there was a warrant out for her arrest she drove down to the police station and turned herself in to the authorities. That would partially explain why she has not been fired yet.

If this is true, then the teen should get charged with filing a false police report.

Is there a separate source that confirms this?