LOL. Just like with Pizzagate, the media went HAM and made unprecedented denials. That's a good indicator the so-called "conspiracy theory" is factual.
- - - Updated - - -
BTW, interesting how conspiracy theory posts are allowed when the liberal political bent is put into the message.
I hope this is a non-serious post, because if you are being serious then just...lmfao.
BTW, some dude went to the pizza joint with a gun, and found out the place didn't even have a basement (remember that was a key part of the conspiracy theory). Nothing else about Pizzagate panned out, either.
Do you know who looks up "code words" in emails and creates a theory around them, with absolutely no basis in reality? Paranoid schizophrenics.
Don't get your news from crazy people.
Don't forget, the leader of their crazy movement, Alex Jones, had to recant all of what he said about Pizzagate and the restaurant because he was liable for everything he said and even their defense in court was that his character on screen was an act. And people like Incredibale STILL believe them.
What evidence? The authority of people who are bullshitting you from the tribune isn't evidence in itself. FBI director said "we got evidence somewhere", CIA said the same, Hillary said the same, and now you believe there's actually something behind those claims without actually having seen anything. It's like Colin Powell's "bioweapons of Saddam", that was an outright lie.
Except that doesn't actually happen to any great degree. This entire topic was done to death before the election, with idiots screaming 'CNN FAKE NEWS' to the point that the mods started banning people who cried wolf. Whenever people said 'okay, show us how Article X is fake', people like you always mumbled and waved vaguely before screaming again.
You think all, or even a good percentage, of news is fake? Prove it.
59% of Democrats think Russia literally hacked voting results to make Trump become the president.
Facts don't matter to the average person. People don't care.
Remember war in Iraq? What did the news say those days? That all of that was a fair deal. In other words, the media was basically working for government directly. The narrative has changed since then, mostly because there was too much pressure, you can't hide an elephant in a locker, but the reason why it wasn't a big deal is that no one in the first world already gave a damn, to people in the West it was just a TV show about democracy.
Now though, this is another matter because all these desperate arabs with nothing to lose are adding interactivity to the great show by blowing up some idiots here and there like in Manchester. And it's totally fine by me because it demonatrates the democratic responsibility. You knowingly voted for people who messed up Middle East, now you pay with your lives. Not on an adequate scale yet, but still.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/20/politi...house-website/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.e663c20ecdc6
https://archive.is/UdoKW
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sources-...ump-cia-visit/
http://time.com/4645541/donald-trump...e-oval-office/
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/01...ent-officials/
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/civil...fuels-mistrust
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.99a472b93323
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/31/politi...ourt-hardiman/
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2017/02/...t-stay-in-nyc/
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/05/u...tegy.html?_r=1
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.af63415b561f
http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/09/politi...xi-phone-call/
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/re...rticle/2614592
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/mo...rticle/2614645
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-am...anders-n721386
http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...ed-to-round-up
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/s...icle-1.2975873
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/1...mnuchin-232038
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...zzlies-n708261
http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/...source=copyurl
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-mex...-politics.html
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/02/us-tr...e-service.html
http://www.bet.com/news/national/201...erican-hi.html
http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/02/politi...tal-illnesses/
http://www.imediaethics.org/washingt...press-release/
http://www.weeklystandard.com/washin...article/644360
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...hat-nea/209615
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/russian-hac...report-1598910
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.acda8eeec09a
That took me roughly 10 minutes to put together
Nice strawman you have there. Did you make it yourself?
Answer the question. You've made a claim that it was a lie, now support your claim. How did you determine that it was a lie?
Yeah, you're in crazypants territory here, but just to be sure: what exactly are you saying the media lied about during the Iraq war? You're being pretty vague. If it's about the WMDs, they reported what the Bush administration told them. Not their fault Bush lied.