If a kid plans to kill someone... Even if they don't fully understand it, they sure as hell know it's to cause harm. That's murder.
Self-defence doesn't automatically rule out a guilty conviction when juxtaposed with a death as part of the case. That's where you have things like manslaughter terminology come into play. Usually self-defence comes with manslaughter but self-defence can be used in cases where death doesn't occur like grievous bodily harm and such.
Most bullies are actually opportunistic, they don't plan how they will bully someone, they just go with what's at the time and prey on them when they happen to see them.
They also count on things like fear and embarrassment even tolerance of their victims so they don't get caught.
If the victim happens to be kill their bully at the time of provocation it will still be manslaughter, if they planned to be spotted by the road to push that bully into the road, that's murder.
Whether the court of law can discover the difference, that's down to the victim's mentality... You can see a frightened child to one whose premeditated an attack.
- - - Updated - - -
And that's why you said 'should', that's why they made a law on it. To stop that simple ridiculousness. That and the person you killed, will stop contributing to things you both pay for... Like taxes. Well done, you killed a fellow tax payer.