Funny how 'nuh uh, we haz freedom of speech' can be used by one side but it vanishes for the other isn't it. The officer doesn't have a chance at winning any settlement.
Funny how 'nuh uh, we haz freedom of speech' can be used by one side but it vanishes for the other isn't it. The officer doesn't have a chance at winning any settlement.
Speciation Is Gradual
The wise wolf who's pride is her wisdom isn't so sharp as drunk.
I do enjoy the irony of a police officer wanting to hold someone else accountable for the actions of another. All I ever hear from police officers, is that we should not judge everyone, by the actions of a single person. Personally, I'd be much more pissed at the guy who shot me.
Yeah I think this is a good thing, not that I am for or against BLM. I do think this is a opprotunity once and for all to show some uniformity maybe and prove once and for all in court not only at they not responsible for the BS racism smeared by the right against them, but make it clear you can't sue people even if they are black you disagree with because they protest.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
If this actually works be prepared to see a whole volley of lawsuits made against Trump.
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
This is all that needs to be said on the matter. This has been established multiple times by the courts. You need to demonstrate a specific call to action. It's a very tough standard to meet and is rarely successful in the courts. Same reason I said it didn't apply to Trump whenever that was floated a couple months ago.
Being an asshole isn't illegal and doesn't hold you legally liable.
Well, in Louisiana, I think this is a very hard case to win. As far as I know, the shooter didn't directly reference any of the people being sued, and didn't appear to reference BLM at all.
- - - Updated - - -
I can't speak for other states, but in Louisiana, you generally have to cite specific instances of speech, and that speech would have to be directly inciting people to attack police.
- - - Updated - - -
As others have pointed out, the statements made must be very specific. It's extremely difficult to prove that someone incited another person to commit an act of violence with intent.
I don't like the precedent of leaders of protests being responsible for something one person does. I don't like BLM and how it has completely whipped the black people into a frenzy against white people, but this specific case I don't think they should be held responsible for the shooting.
Good. Hope he wins, George Soros has plenty of money to give anyways.
hopefully, BLM is a criminal organization
TBH BLM really needs to be classified as a Terrorist group. They do more harm than good, incite and promote violence against non-blacks and just act like a gang of thugs and troublemakers that use scare tactics and pressure to get their way. Look at what happened with the pride parade in Toronto. They barged their way in like the uninvited guests that they were, halted the parade and forced the organizers to sign a petition banning the Toronto Police from ever being a part of it again and refused to let the pride parade proceed if they didn't sign.
Last edited by Elerubard; 2017-07-25 at 03:11 PM.
If BLM is held accountable based on the actions of one shooter then US law enforcement should be held accountable for the actions of a few 'bad apples'.
Also, I like how people seem to be incapable of criticising BLM without using the word 'thug'.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
But is BLM even represented by a group of individuals? Unless there is a plan to sue some big figure head of the movement.
Google Diversity Memo
Learn to use critical thinking: https://youtu.be/J5A5o9I7rnA
Political left, right similarly motivated to avoid rival views
[...] we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism)..
When their "jobs" involve presenting a lethal threat and stuff like this http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...an-burglars-do how can they expect not to get a response as we've seen.
It's funny how we've gone from set up videos to mock the american public asserting their rights to omg terrorisms.