So, this certain group by which you mean black people, should have less access to their Constitutional rights...why exactly? Because some comedian makes a facetious argument about abdicating his rights to avoid physical harm?
Well, what about Anthony Promvongsa? He pulled over and seemed to fully comply and?
http://www.twincities.com/2017/06/22...-traffic-stop/
Cop pulled him from the vehicle without even giving him a chance to unbuckle his seatbelt and used the seatbelt's resistance (it wasn't unbuckled, so it held the driver) as a sign of resistance to commit further harm.
Now, in that scenario, how in the hell does that man do anything different to avoid being harmed?
Moreover, the officer engages in a 4th Amendment violation by searching the car without probable cause (this is based on his own statement that he had only circumstantial evidence and did not obtain consent or a warrant).
There are literally thousands of instances like that where a person can do EVERYTHING as you say and still be subject to brutal physical detainment, arrest and potentially death.
Moreover, it doesn't answer the initial question of WHY should any US Citizen be asked to deny their rights? Why? Because police view black people as inherently "scary" and an imminent threat simply by being? (btw, that argument has been used successfully in court by officers, so it's not a troll. It's an actual legal argument)
So, I don't care what Chris Rock says. If being a US Citizen is to mean anything at all, every citizen must have FULL access to ALL of the rights and privileges granted under the various US and State Constitutions.