1. #1
    Deleted

    Contaminated blood scandal survivors boycott meeting with health officials

    http://www.itv.com/news/2017-07-20/c...lth-officials/

    Survivors of the contaminated blood scandal and their families are refusing to meet with Government officials ahead of an official of an official inquiry into how they were left exposed to disease.

    Members of several groups have said they will boycott a planned meeting with the Department of Health (DH) which is intended to help set the terms of the review.

    They have said it is inappropriate for the department to be involved when it is itself under investigation over alleged failures to protect patients who were given blood products infected with hepatitis C and HIV.

    Around 2,400 were killed after being infected with serious illnesses from transfusions given in the 1970s and 80s, with documents suggesting that health chiefs were aware of the risks.

    A joint statement from groups including Tainted Blood, the Forgotten Few, Positive Women and the Contaminated Blood Campaign said they "universally reject" the planned meeting with the DH today.

    "We do not believe that the DH should be allowed to direct or have any involvement into an investigation into themselves, other than giving evidence.

    The handling of this inquiry must be immediately transferred elsewhere."

    – JOINT STATEMENT

    Liz Carroll, the chief executive of the Haemophilia Society, also turned down an invite to the meeting.

    In a letter to Theresa May, she said that campaigners and MPs alike argued that the department "must not be involved in deciding the remit and powers of an inquiry that will be investigating the actions of its ministers and staff".

    "I am sure you can imagine the distress and distrust this would cause for those who are so desperate for the truth to be told."

    She called for the managing of the inquiry to be passed to another department and the meeting with Government health officials to be cancelled.

    The meeting is still believed to be going ahead despite the outcry.

    A Department of Health spokeswoman said: "We are absolutely committed to a thorough and transparent inquiry.

    "To establish the best format and remit, we want to hear as many opinions as possible. Our door is open for anyone who wants to discuss the inquiry or raise any concerns."

    Downing Street insisted the inquiry would be independent and concerned parties would be asked whether they wanted a judge-led inquiry or a Hillsborough-style panel.

  2. #2
    Titan Seranthor's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Langley, London, Undisclosed Locations
    Posts
    11,355
    Quote Originally Posted by adam86shadow View Post
    *snip*
    How do you feel about this? What are your thoughts? Seems the folks are turning down a clear opportunity to effect change. Just my thoughts.

    --- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.

  3. #3
    Is there still a need for change? Article says it refers to contamination that happened in the 70s and 80s.

  4. #4
    Scarab Lord
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    One path
    Posts
    4,907
    Quote Originally Posted by adam86shadow View Post
    More interested in why you'd copy pasta this without any input from yourself What's your opinion on it since you feel like everyone must know about this?

  5. #5
    Deleted
    My opinion is mixed; I see their point but feel boycotting the meeting won't help them with justice

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •