@
The Iron Fist is no less "problematic" than @
Mehrunes is, aside the fact that maybe the latter is a bit more active. Just in case you didn't know. Unless you judge non-problematic the habit of telling to various people "L2lore" while showing industrial amounts of lore ignorance himself. A victim deserving some quiet safe space indeed.
I mean, I literally just said that is pretty much justified to ignore people that effectively waste your time and argue in circles. Way to come up with a convenient reply to a post you read as it fitted you most. You may call the people involved "biased" and it may even be true but you should also consider the little, insignificant fact that you may be just as biased. On the end of the day, in a world where pretty much everyone has a "bias" towards something, the solidity of the arguments exposed is what matters. That's precisely from what you judge how much you can blame on "bias" the stance of a certain poster.
Needless to say, if you're incapable to offer equally grounded replies and counter-arguments than the tip of the scale risks to fall on your side. You also don't need to involve yourself in overly long discussions, I very rarely do that myself. In fact, to counter that I try to expose my points in the clearest, most complete way I can. That tends to be very helpful. If said points are "shaky" and not very convincing than indeed it can go on forever. And that marks the difference between simply agreeing to disagree and ignoring people out of disagreement.