I will gladly debate with anyone who has a differing POV about any of those issues. If you have a solid argument, you might even convince me.
Thing is, you need to actually have a POV, and not just be a fence sitter who doesn't try to advocate for their beliefs.
Moderate != Centrist
Being a moderate means to think for yourself.
Being a moderate means having an honest discussion about important issues.
Doing that leads you to a quite apparent conclusion non of the two parties that you have a choice of represent what you believe in.
The issues that the country and the world are facing are much more complex than what the candidates are trying to feed you.
Since those kind of people will always be a minority, and a minority that is hard to influence through media propaganda they are usually discarded in a political discussion.
Why the fuck would you care about moderates, when you can use your usual propaganda tools such as fear, showmanship, outright lies, shift of focus from really important issues to made up issues, polarization of the society and making people fight against each other and get your votes.
What happenned in Charlotsville is not just the logical outcome of the Dem vs Rep shitshow, it is what the people in both parties need the most. More fear, more anger, more division.
And then someone else will say:
As of right now you have the two factions in the US political system: one is actively trying to increase governmental spending and increase the all time high debt, while the other one is fighting for rational spending and decreasing the debt. One is actively trying to interfere in the free market system, that was one of the foundations of the economical growth of this country, while the other is fighting to get government out of the economy. One is actively trying to strip you of your constitutional rights, control your freedom of speech, take away your right to bear arms, while the other one is fighting for the principles, that were stated by the forefathers in the constitution. One is working hard to destroy the american family interfering in the way you should raise your children, promoting abortions as a way of contraception, while the other one fights hard to protect the family values. One is actively pushing the idea that a person must be judged by his race, gender or sexual orientation, while the other one fights hard to protect the notion that a person must be judged only by merit and talent.
You can have room to be moderate when I don't have to live in fear that my son will not get into a good college with higher grades and better talent than another kid just because he is white. I don't have to live in fear that I will not get my dream job because I am not a member of a specific gender, minority or other group. Or when people won't have to fear that their religious beliefs would be trampled by the government in an effort to "protect" the rights of the minorities.
And the list of stupid exxagerations can go on and on.
You are just proving the OPs point.
There is no field for a moderate political discussion anymore. And there is no need for it, since just shouting nonesense and speaking with slogans is enough.
Donald Trump is the perfect incarnation of modern US politics. Everyone was so surprised that he won, but he is what this system was designed for and the only surprise is that it took so long for someone like him to become a president.
No I mean that with the constant degradation of the discourse, the mass hysteria on both sides of the political spectrum, the showmanship, the demagogy, the polarization Trump is quite a logical result.
- - - Updated - - -
Well since the post that I was answering to was full of reasonable points and truth of life it is quite obvious that mine was also as reasonable and truthful.
If by "both sides" you mean "the Republican Party", sure.
Trump is the chicken coming home to roost; the Republican Party has been appealing to the lowest common denominator and shitting over established political convention for years now. In fact, I'd be willing to point out the Palin nomination as the watershed moment that made the entry of the crazy populists on the far right into the mainstream political conversation possible.
It's a tale as old as time, ultimately; the Republicans reared up a monster of their own making for political advantage, and have been consumed by it.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
#boycottchina
But if you say that, you are not a moderate. You are standing for something. I can debate you on the merit of your ideas, and vice versa. We could talk about whether national debt is a concern worth shutting down the government over, or how much social spending is too much, or where the government's involvement in your personal life should end.
Those are policy positions that have an inherent dichotomy, and there is a compromise somewhere to be had in the middle (whether we can find it is another story).
That is the intention of the marketplace of ideas. That your idea and my idea each have flaws, which are made better by finding the common ground.
Not that I can spout an idea, you can spout an idea, and some third guy, with no opinions, gets to yell at both of us and claim some moral high ground because hes a moderate.
Okay, so you get to yell at people with different views than you because of your own moral high-ground (ie: claim that you're "standing for something"), but you come back crying when someone else than your "enemy" decides he has enough of your shit? You're just rationalizing the fact that you can't stand being served your own medecine. Hypocrite.