I guess catching a possibly lethal or crippling disease that the kid could be protected against doesn't scare her.“God forbid he were to be injured by one of the vaccines. Then what? That’s what scares me.”
God forbid he were to contract a dangerous disease by not getting a vaccination.
If parents are worried about their kid getting autism from a vaccine (no evidence that this has ever even been the case) then what it really means is they'd rather their kid risk life-threatening illnesses than have autism.
In general, they actually do quite well. They have a much higher college graduation rate & gpa (source).
This is thought to be because students that are home-schooled are generally done because the parent is committed to their child's success. The generally receive a full education, but essentially have a private tutor (their teacher) to help them with all their problems. If they're struggling in math, the teacher can simply shift the day' schedule to do more math so the student grasps it. If they need more homework, they'll assign it. Since education is at home, it's also much more engaged, help is readily available, and teachers are able to hand build the curriculum and assignments around a single pupil.
I did my freshman year of high school at home, and I was able to finish both freshman and sophomore year in one year. My mom didn't want me to finish high school in 2 years, so she sent me to the public school for the remainder of my education. I placed out of pretty much every sophmore/junior course and was sat with seniors. That year propelled me greatly academically.
“You can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit me.”
– C.S. Lewis
These people need to be sterilized. (not really but...)
Stupid bitch... how do you send him out the front door everyday where much greater and more probable risks are everyday.God forbid he were to be injured by one of the vaccines. Then what? That’s what scares me.”
Lots of people home-school their children in the US. I'm not sure how "good" it is, but it's definitely an option that is there.
The main problem in this case isn't vaccines or waivers or home schooling; it's that the parents are divorced and have joint custody. That is, if the father says one thing and the mother says another then an arbitrator--in this case a judge--has to step in. He did so on the side of the father and getting vaccinated, and now the mother's refusal is in defiance of a court order.
If the two of them could simply agree on an outcome, the law would support either decision they made. But they can't, and now judges are involved. Ignoring them is not an option.
“Nostalgia was like a disease, one that crept in and stole the colour from the world and the time you lived in. Made for bitter people. Dangerous people, when they wanted back what never was.” -- Steven Erikson, The Crippled God
I'm confused as to why people have the most stupidest link to vaccinations with autism... If the child has autism then that's life? A child will develop those characteristics regardless, it's in their bloody genetics and their body. Contracting a deadly disease is certainly not genetic. After watching my son be on death's door by just having an infection that was cured by antibiotics and a blood transfusion, I was the fucking first to be in the door for vaccinations for my kids.
If a simple bacterial infection almost took a life - something we can battle roughly everyday by our immune system, I won't be taking chances with fair scarier shit that can be prevented by just a single pin prick. I don't get why people don't see that.
What irks me even more if having a religious view but somehow loving the fact we have science intergrated into the world and taking those advantages despite it? Just so idiotic with bringing in the whole religious thing. Where was her religious calling when she was giving birth? I bet you any money they wouldn't have brought up their religious beliefs if complications arrived. I seriously doubt they would say God's work will make sure the baby lives or dies. Fuck no, I bet any any complications she would be running straight to science for herself and the child. Just complete hypocrisy from the moment she spare her legs to this court case to pretend otherwise.
Last edited by Evangeliste; 2017-09-29 at 09:04 PM.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy
This is from the Andrew Wakefield scam in 1998. While his publication was completely bogus and was retracted in 2004, but it stuck to people's minds.
"I dun wantz muh born normal kid to develop autism from teh vaccines, so I'll not only endanger him but also every kid coming in contact with him err'day!".
That's how I think of anti-vaxxers. There are no reasons acceptable other than medical ones. Thinking your child will become autistic, ain't a medical reason. It's just stupidity. Religious reasons can, quite frankly, go to hell.
What is it about white suburban mothers who seem to follow this anti-vaxxer trend?
Before people accuse me of being racist let me explain. I'm in a predominantly Hispanic and Asian area due to the businesses nearby and also the myriad of universities etc. If I hadn't met these lovely women I would have chalked it up as a stereotype but no, white, often late 20s to middle-aged, mostly middle-class income women who not only seem to be hell-bent on being anti-vaccination but overwhelmingly opt to not get a vitamin-k injection at birth for their child which is pretty much standard practice everywhere else.
A few times might be a coincidence but if they weren't different people I would swear they are channeling the same hive-mind and it's honestly uncanny. Thankfully not everyone is unreasonable and some kindness, understanding for their concerns, actually talking to them and showing data for both the hack that is Andrew Wakefield and current day publications tend to win them over. Of course there are the unreasonable ones and it's pointless to try and convince them as they are immovable in their misguided beliefs.
Oh and a bunch of them seemed to be quite taken with Gwenyth Paltrow. Am I missing something as I don't follow pop-culture much .
"It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum... and I'm all outta ass."
I'm a British gay Muslim Pakistani American citizen, ask me how that works! (terribly)
What about home schooling where the state approved public school material is provided to the student to work through in a self paced manner.
Oklahoma has that through a for-profit corporation. Controversy aside their attainment stats are higher than traditional public school, are taught the same curriculum and students are allowed to test out of grade level if they reach mastery of a subject.
I work with a guy who moved from South Carolina and he and his brother both tested out of high school at age 15 under a similar program.
Only argument I have to home schooling is you have to have a student who is well motivated to learn and stay on task or parents who can maintain discipline enough so they child stays on task. If you don't have that "home school" may as well be permanent recess for all the good it does.
The Right isn't universally bad. The Left isn't universally good. The Left isn't universally bad. The Right isn't universally good. Legal doesn't equal moral. Moral doesn't equal legal. Illegal doesn't equal immoral. Immoral doesn't equal illegal.
Have a nice day.
I can understand that, but was surprised that religious reasons was specifically listed, and philosophical as well.
It reads like "Well I don't want to vaccinate because I think they are bad, because reasons" would be a valid excuse for a waiver, which seems really shortsighted to me.
For what its worth, I was sent to Catholic school for 13 years. Our science classes taught evolution as the sole predominant theory among scientists.
Our religion classes taught creationism as the way God designed the universe.
This was reconciled in the overarching curriculum as "God designed life on Earth, and used evolution as the means to do so" which is much more palatable than cavemen riding dinosaurs onto Noah's ark.
Of course, the most surefire way to make someone agnostic or atheist is to indoctrinate them in hypocritical christian policy for their entire childhood. Naturally, I identify as agnostic since about age 12.
Oh I know about that research, but I'm confused as to why people even think that is even reasonable research and study. The foundation of everything in that research has nothing crucial. I can understand religion, it's kind of exempt in a way to have supporting evidence if you understand that... But science as an entirety had to be built on fundamental and supporting evidence.
I also don't understand how for this particular thing, religiously it's been included to further back up the mother, in a sense denying science to strength anti-vaxxing but yet in the same token, say that science has dictated that vaccinations give autism as a decent and further cause to also deny it. It's like trying to have your cake and eat it with a heavy sparkle of hypocrisy... It's like just moronic in itself.
Last edited by Evangeliste; 2017-09-30 at 11:52 AM.
Wait, one of her arguments is the fear of her child being harmed by the vaccine yet she is apparently completely fine with letting her child be vulnerable to potentially life threatening diseases? wow I think I just had my fill of stupid for the day.
I hope she goes to jail and the child gets the vaccines while she is behind bars.
Last edited by Donald Hellscream; 2017-09-30 at 12:00 PM.