Call Buzzfeed what you want, their primary focus is entertainment news. And they are moderate liberal biased as well.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/buzzfeed/
Quote where I “went after the source”.
All I simply did was state what their primary focus was and their political leaning. I even posted a fact check link for people to make up their own minds. I kept completely neutral about them.
I never once stated that Buzzfeed wasn’t a legitimate news source.
It seems all you have to do is attack me.
Have a wonderful day everyone.
"Call Buzzfeed what you want, their primary focus is entertainment news. And they are moderate liberal biased as well.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/buzzfeed/"
You went after the source, and not the information that was provided.
You. Are. Welcome. Let me know if you want to discuss the content of the article, instead of the source.
...and then we all died of not surprise.
Seriously, did anyone not already know this. Milo says as much whenever anyone asks him. He's either dumb enough to not understand what the Alt-Right really is, or corrupt/evil enough to try to normalize them and equate anyone who is anti-establishment with the alt-right. Milo has been extremely dangerous by normalizing the alt-right over the past couple years.
Is there supposed to be news in the buzzfeed article?
“I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: ‘O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.’ And God granted it.” -- Voltaire
"He who awaits much can expect little" -- Gabriel Garcia Marquez
To be fair, Buzzfeed will print anything that forwards their left leaning political agenda. I'm not saying we should automatically discount everything they say, but anytime you get the urge to source Buzzfeed, I would suggest digging a little deeper and finding their sources. Buzzfeed isn't reliable.
- not saying this has anything to do with the current "leak", like I said above, this info seems like common knowledge at this point.
Agreed. Just don't start with "Buzzfeed says..." Find their sources and use it instead. Then you don't have to worry about the point getting missed.
It's like starting a thread with "did you hear the latest thing on Fox News??" That thread isn't going anywhere regardless of how authentic the information may be.
- - - Updated - - -
So when Milo said as much, you didn't believe him, but now that you see the emails, you think Milo wasn't lying after all?
It's not my source. What you do, is continue to look for more information, and continue to form your opinions based on new evidence.
As for Milo, a great deal in this article was never actually stated by him. I've always known him to be nothing more than a vapid puppet, and this demonstrates it.
Maybe you missed it, but this is how Slacker started off this thread:
"Incredibly fascinating piece at Buzzfeed"
Not a great idea, 'cause it automatically derails the thread. I always check sources, so you are preaching to the choir as far as how response should be handled, I'm just saying, advice to all those out there who think starting a quote with a non-reputable source is a very bad idea as a way to start a dialogue.
For your second point, what's an example of something the article said that was news to you or shocking to be revealed?
If you are openly defending or deflecting for the alt right and white supremacists in this thread, kiss any shred of pretense that you are just "right wing" or "conservative" goodbye. No more hiding. You're part of it.
He used a reference to the Night of the Long Knives as a password. Where the gay leader of the brownshirts was murdered on the orders of Hitler once they were no longer useful. Either he hilariously misses the significance or he... welcomes the thought?
Rather ironic, after all those lies what took him down was actually telling the truth about something he actually believed.
Kind of sends the wrong message, really.
He denied it, case closed. LOL.
Not surprised to see you shilling for the alt right of course.
Ooh, someone's triggered. I wonder why.