warriors with warglaves

[silendeath]

so now that all fury warriors are going to be using 2h's for fury, kinda sucks to give a glave to a warrior, and what are you gana do if you have one or a set right now?

[Gaeldar]

You know that glaives will suck in expansion?

[vlj]

will probably just leave it in my inventory so I can flash it to every rogue I meet

And it is great for prot DPSing!

[Darkskeleton]

You know that glaives will suck in expansion?

I think he was concerned about the time period from when the crossover patch is released on live and wrath is released, for when fury warriors can spec for Titan's grip.

[silendeath]

will probably just leave it in my inventory so I can flash it to every rogue I meet

And it is great for prot DPSing!

yeah kinda sucks, my turn was coming up soon oh well there's always frostmourne

[Gonaer]

"oh well there's always frostmourne"

Or is there?

[erzy]

yeah kinda sucks, my turn was coming up soon oh well there's always frostmourne

which should be Paladin Only

[Xs]

which should be Paladin Only

it should be DK only lore wise
otherwise it would turn your char into a DK

[Robby]

Why should it be paladin only?

[mrchee]

Why should it be paladin only?

Because paladins whined enough to be able to do dps (they shouldnt)

[Chidorimai]

Lore wise Frostmourne turns you into a NPC. So...

[Wurfab]

blablabla, Mr. Freeman?

glaiveset is made for rogues btw, just look @ teh offhand speed so gtfo warriors!!!!

glad i already have my set!

[Explosive]

it should be DK only lore wise
otherwise it would turn your char into a DK

Fixed
Even though I think adding Frostmourne in the game might be one of the most retarded ideas ever.
o much easier to tell some fairy tale about the Lich King's soul finally being destroyed, followed by Frostmourne and the armor.
It even sounds better than having 20 people per realm running around with a sword so significant when it comes to Warcraft lore and history

[Drawme]

Letting people get Frostmourne is like letting people play Illidan. There's "important" - the warglaives, etc - and then there's "world defining", and Frostmourne is world-defining. It'd be like LotRO giving a player The One Ring (which I sincerely hope they never, ever do).

[Explosive]

Agree with the poster above me, even though I never quite grasped the significance (or even importance) of the Warglaives. I mean, I have yet to encounter any info on Azzinoth, other than Illidan slaying him and stealing his weapons

[Tigercat]

so now that all fury warriors are going to be using 2h's for fury, kinda sucks to give a glave to a warrior, and what are you gana do if you have one or a set right now?

The same thing I do with my T-fury, flaunt it occasionally.

Granted, a quest line > a single random drop, but oh well.

[ascote]

Dual wield frostmourne ashbringer anyone? There's only one reason why warglaives where limited to warriors and rogues, the reason is hunters. I'd say Atiesh is a bit more defining than frostmourne, but wathever. We all know thousands of warriors/paladins/DK (and even some pesky hunters) are salivating to get a frostmourne in game and damn blizzard if they don't get one.

[ambient]

glaiveset is made for rogues btw, just look @ teh offhand speed so gtfo warriors!!!!

glad i already have my set!

thanks for the info, ignorant rogue.

[DiscoMoonkin]

its gonna drop a legendary that dont make sense

its like kijaeden dropping a bow

[Wurfab]

thanks for the info, ignorant rogue.

thats how it is, the offhand speed makes it a rogue set imo, the MH is of course the best for warriors pre - KJ, but the set consisting of the 2 weapons is clearly made for rogues, so slap the guild that gives it to a warr as long as there is a needing rogue in the raid who is not a trial member.