Originally Posted by
monkeysnarf
I never kept track of all the references to item budgets over at EJ. I have always been more interested in the actual values on real pieces of armor, than how Blizzard came up with them. Never did I imagine someone would use a small tangent, even throw-away, comment to try and derail the conversation to cover up their own flawed logic that leather > mail, after they had been proven wrong. So yeah that's my bad for not book marking every instance of general assumed logic over at EJ, when I never really cared about it in the first place.
I have yet to see 2 same ilvl items, for the same spec, drop from 2 different bosses, where both are not set pieces. As an example, I don't see 1 ilvl 213 mail enhance tier chest piece and 2 ilvl 213 mail enhance non-tier pieces. All I see is 1 ilvl 213 tier piece and 1 ilvl 213 non-tier piece. It is entirely possible that I have missed this. After all I'm not writing a book on item budgets. Still though, you cannot prove your assertion that Blizzard gives bonus item budget to certain pieces if they drop off of certain bosses. I will admit that I don't know the value of set-piece-bonus's item budget.
Plus, all of this doesn't matter anyway.
* You said leather > mail and posted a list so we can see for ourselves.
* I proved that when comparing apples to apples mail > leather.
* Barrar has stated that his spread sheet also shows mail > leather.
Stop! Quit drawing on tangents like int = spell crit, item budgets and other non-issues. In Wotlk you are wrong about leather. You were right in BC. You may be right again next xpac.