Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
... LastLast
  1. #21

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    here are a couple ideas maybe...vengeance should maybe be 5 talent points going up to 5% increased damage each critical stacking 3 times..15% increased damage over time instead of 9% now, and righteous vengeance should be increased to 100% damage but over 15 seconds instead of 8 seconds...less burst but alot better long term damage

  2. #22

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    The problem with tinkering with vengeance is that anything they do to vengeance, they have to do to the DK equivalent.
    Actually, Mr. Lennon, I CAN imagine a world with no hatred, religion, war, or violence.
    I can also imagine attacking such a world, because they would never see it coming.

    http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/trashcan.jpg
    http://politicalhumor.about.com/libr...s/carville.jpe

    For once, Carville was a man ahead of his time.

  3. #23

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Quote Originally Posted by Tigercat
    The problem with tinkering with vengeance is that anything they do to vengeance, they have to do to the DK equivalent.
    Yeah, because Crusader Strike is just as good as Scourge Strike is too, right?

  4. #24

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Quote Originally Posted by greatrichie
    I don't like the fact that if they balance our mana regen around this glyph, Ret will have 4 mandatory-type glyphs, and will have sacrifice an actual damage increasing glyph to have a shadow of what was once SA. If I come out wrong and the glyph mana is just extra mana, then fine, but in that situation, why even take the glyph?
    make it a minor glyph. Problem solved.

  5. #25

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Ilovepeaches, methinks you should have paid a little more attention to Blue Posts during the wotlk beta. They specifically said that the two "vengeance" talents should be kept practically identical, which they are.

    You seem a little butthurt that another class finally got an attack that's based on melee mechanics, but ignores armor though. About time, imo.
    Actually, Mr. Lennon, I CAN imagine a world with no hatred, religion, war, or violence.
    I can also imagine attacking such a world, because they would never see it coming.

    http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/trashcan.jpg
    http://politicalhumor.about.com/libr...s/carville.jpe

    For once, Carville was a man ahead of his time.

  6. #26

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Quote Originally Posted by ilovepeaches
    Yeah, because Crusader Strike is just as good as Scourge Strike is too, right?
    Your droll sarcasm aside, he was pointing out to how Blizzard made a statement long ago that any changes they made to Vengeance would probably be mirrored to Bloody Vengeance as well, because of how analogous they are. It took a year for Shaman Flurry to catch up with Warrior Flurry, but the same parallelism exists.

  7. #27

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Quote Originally Posted by Tehdweeb
    make it a minor glyph. Problem solved.
    Thats all fine, but what glyph that changes how a spell works is a minor? I would put money on it being a major.

    http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Terokkar&n=Greatrichie

  8. #28

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Richie you son of a bitch, how the hell are ya?  Busy?  I know it's tax season .  Browsing forums while I'm supposed to be doing something productive is fun.
    Actually, Mr. Lennon, I CAN imagine a world with no hatred, religion, war, or violence.
    I can also imagine attacking such a world, because they would never see it coming.

    http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/trashcan.jpg
    http://politicalhumor.about.com/libr...s/carville.jpe

    For once, Carville was a man ahead of his time.

  9. #29

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Sup? How you been man? I've been chillin, being jewish and stuff.

    http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Terokkar&n=Greatrichie

  10. #30

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Heh, relaxing when I can. Problem is, anytime I think I've actually got a couple solid hours free some shit comes up. Small town + one of very few with some level of competance with PC repair + shit economy = low free time, AND low cash.


    I'd still prefer it to being Jewish >.>
    Actually, Mr. Lennon, I CAN imagine a world with no hatred, religion, war, or violence.
    I can also imagine attacking such a world, because they would never see it coming.

    http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/trashcan.jpg
    http://politicalhumor.about.com/libr...s/carville.jpe

    For once, Carville was a man ahead of his time.

  11. #31

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    That hurts...

    http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Terokkar&n=Greatrichie

  12. #32

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Meh, I can think of worse fates.  I log on the shaman occasionally for a little leveling action, but it's a far cry from our run when wotlk came out speed-wise.


    "You should level in Storm Peaks, the xp is great here"
    "Fuck you and that place, I'm staying here"
    "I'm getting <insert xp here> per hour, though"
    "Be right there"

    PS: I'm still pissed I didnt know there was a realm first achievement for vanguard of northrend. I got the freakin rep you get when wearing no tabard to exalted before I even touched ebon blade!
    Actually, Mr. Lennon, I CAN imagine a world with no hatred, religion, war, or violence.
    I can also imagine attacking such a world, because they would never see it coming.

    http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/trashcan.jpg
    http://politicalhumor.about.com/libr...s/carville.jpe

    For once, Carville was a man ahead of his time.

  13. #33

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    How about killing two birds with one stone?

    They want exorcism in the standard ret rotation. (Done, it's now usable on every mob)

    They want ret to utilize the other trees beyond divine strength. (Move Purifying Power to Tier 2 or Tier 3 - reduced CD on exorcism, actually making it a viable inclusion in a rotation - and the reduced mana cost on consecration would be a help to the mana pool - not that consecration is in the normal rotation, just any little bit helps right?)

    The reduced CD especially in Tier 2, makes it worthwhile to take.

  14. #34

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    lol, yeah leveling was a great experience. Not so fun after the initial race tho

    http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Terokkar&n=Greatrichie

  15. #35

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Quote Originally Posted by Quinc
    How about killing two birds with one stone?

    They want exorcism in the standard ret rotation. (Done, it's now usable on every mob)

    They want ret to utilize the other trees beyond divine strength. (Move Purifying Power to Tier 2 or Tier 3 - reduced CD on exorcism, actually making it a viable inclusion in a rotation - and the reduced mana cost on consecration would be a help to the mana pool - not that consecration is in the normal rotation, just any little bit helps right?)

    The reduced CD especially in Tier 2, makes it worthwhile to take.
    But consecration is in our normal rotation. No consecration means we do laughable DPS. They would have to buff THE HELL out of DS/CS/Etc to make up for losing Cons if they intend it to be out of our normal rotation, or give us a new skill to use in it's place. It makes up a pretty decent chunk of rets dmg.

    It would be nice though if they made teh exor CD reduction in a lower tier we could take would be amazing, but it wouldn't be a huge buff, which frankly, we need(for PvE, it would probably be mildly OP in PvP if you've seen how much Exor can hit for on teh PTR)

    http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Terokkar&n=Greatrichie

  16. #36
    Dreadlord Baygon's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    On top of the Oshu'gun in Nagrand
    Posts
    934

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Quote Originally Posted by pikl2r
    Amen to that.

    Though I dont think that change alone would bring the edge which the PTR retri lacks in terms of dps.
    no. just no. Paladins are a Hybrid Class for a reason so they can multi task not be OP be thankful for whats happened so far. Mages are getting nothing coming up next patch
    Unfortunately, until the people at Blizzard take time to quit explaining why they are right and anyone who disagrees is wrong, they are not going to even hear everyone speaking out desperately trying to warn them the ship is sinking.
    the problems driving players from WoW aren't content or the age of the game, the problem is how the game experience and design philosophy are being undermined by Blizzard's hubris and greed.

  17. #37

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Quote Originally Posted by Baygon
    no. just no. Paladins are a Hybrid Class for a reason so they can multi task not be OP be thankful for whats happened so far. Mages are getting nothing coming up next patch
    I forgot we could tank heal and Dps at the same time, silly me.

  18. #38
    Dreadlord Baygon's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    On top of the Oshu'gun in Nagrand
    Posts
    934

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    yes, but even if blizzard screws up 1 role u can do you still have 2 left to play with. mages don't
    Unfortunately, until the people at Blizzard take time to quit explaining why they are right and anyone who disagrees is wrong, they are not going to even hear everyone speaking out desperately trying to warn them the ship is sinking.
    the problems driving players from WoW aren't content or the age of the game, the problem is how the game experience and design philosophy are being undermined by Blizzard's hubris and greed.

  19. #39

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Quote Originally Posted by Baygon
    no. just no. Paladins are a Hybrid Class for a reason so they can multi task not be OP be thankful for whats happened so far. Mages are getting nothing coming up next patch
    lol watch a pally tank as ret, or Heal as prot and see how far they get. It's not going to happen. Stop using this "OMG U CAN HEAL AND TANK AND DPS ALL IN ONE SPEC" like we can spec 71/71/71. We spec Ret to DPS, not be told to shut up and heal.

    jesus, most idiotic argument in the current WoW atmoshpere...

    http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Terokkar&n=Greatrichie

  20. #40
    Pandaren Monk Paladin885's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    'MERICA!
    Posts
    1,892

    Re: GC posts again about Ret

    Quote Originally Posted by Soad0488
    Make divine storm holy damage in PvE
    thats impossible. There is no "on/off" switch for any spell in wow except in arena's were some ar enot allowed in play.


    Dont make it holy dmg again. Or we'll see 99.9% of all pallies going ret again and able to kill s6 players in lvl 75 blues. that QQ shit...i dont ever wanna see it again. I felt so embarassed to be my class 5-6months ago because of that BS that came out of the wow community.

    Its fine as it is now.


    If you guys need more dps then Id advise helping blizz come up with a 3rd-4th attack as you only have 2 minus the 2 instant casts. DKs have like 20 attacks to do, warriors have abotu 4-5 and currently pallies click 3 buttons on all 3 specs lol.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •