theyre prolly not going to give you something active.Originally Posted by Exorte
they might buff your passive.
the path theyre going to take will still be the same as they stated
theyre prolly not going to give you something active.Originally Posted by Exorte
they might buff your passive.
the path theyre going to take will still be the same as they stated
Did you read the first seven pages of the thread where I already had this argument with a resto drood, or are you one of his alternate accounts?Originally Posted by terrminus
Originally Posted by Iceforge
In this brust brust PvP, a class with only passive def is going to be OP for some class or very weak for others.Originally Posted by Mysmere
they weather going to nerf melee (about close gap), or give us way against melee.
so you have to be prot war to wear a shield? listen mate. any good warrior will know when to go sword and bored. if you healer is getting major cc then equip your shield and start spamming spell reflect or shield wall..Originally Posted by Idaho Immortal
I aslo fail to see why blizzard doesn't even respond to this question which has been asked of them many times in the forums but no blue post of it yet for how long now ;/Originally Posted by Nixia
i think its because they dont want it to be to much of a wanna be blink.Originally Posted by Screecher
Because it would be like blink? mages can remove stuns but not snares. Locks remove snares but not stuns, sounds fair to me.Originally Posted by Nixia
Also i think they've ripped too many of the mage abilities allready and given them to warlocks, whats the point of having 2 classes with almoust exact same kind of abilities? none.
Ya but I want them to state it, they usually answer any question written on their forums, this one has been asked for awhile and still no statement, theirs no reason to be scared to answer it.
sorry for not reading all 17 pages and repeating someone if theyve said this.
after doing a lot of arena, its pretty clear we need some form of defence from melee, now most people are probably suggesting the usual junk that you think will work (iceblocks/bubbles etc).
these would really suck for a warlock, and besides, it doesnt change the way people play, you will get focussed as soon as your bubble or w/e wears off, or when you break it, simple as.
Warlocks need something that means melee have to actually make a choice whether to go on the lock, as appose to tunnel vision cleave "gank the warlock, ignore everything else".
personally i think it very easily fixed:
- I would love to see soul link pet damage severely reduced or removed (perhaps class it as aoe damage, so pets get 85% less damage? or maybe thats too much)
- Give demon armour a bit more umph, perhaps another 2/3k armour, and maybe 10% less stun or something, nothing overpowered, but the armour would be a very simple fix, i dont know how much armour would make it deter melee, but i do think it needs a bit more.
I think blizzard will be thinking along the same lines, dont expect 3.2 to come around and some magic new spell to pop up, or for demonic portal to remove stuns (that will never happy imo, will just set off mages) i think they will going something along the lines of above, maybe even no warlock fix, and just bonus armour back on pvp items.
just my 2 cents.
well its an other solution to make our passive defence better but is it enough? i doubt it. i think something have to be done with melee damage all together instead. because we already have shit loads of migation we practically wear plate and stil they smack us to a bloody pulp in secs. maybe some kind of nerf to AP? or something.Originally Posted by spec
or well maybe not that would affect pve badly. um but the damage out put of melees should be reduced on other players (if possible) that way world of meleecraft would end abit.