Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ...
5
6
7
  1. #121

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/th...eNo=2&sid=1#20

    The worgen should not technically belong to any of the pet families and was therefore removed. This means the pet no longer has access to pet talents or abilities. Whether or not similar circumstances with hunter pets in the past have occurred isn't really relevant. Given the nature of the creature that was tamed in this case, we feel it should not belong to any of the eligible pet families from which a hunter can choose his or her combat companion.

  2. #122

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Can someone ask why we can't feed him? It means I can never have him out or else he'll eventually run away.

    This is total bull.

  3. #123

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Quote Originally Posted by xSaix
    Can someone ask why we can't feed him? It means I can never have him out or else he'll eventually run away.

    This is total bull.
    Once again read it, they didn't want him to ever be tamed so they are making sure that those that have it will either choose to perma stable it or having the pet run away from not being fed so they lose the pet.

  4. #124

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Quote Originally Posted by morph4037
    Once again read it, they didn't want him to ever be tamed.
    Only Warlocks are allowed to have cool looking pets. The Werewolf skin was too OP. It caused everyone that saw it to stop and stare and then the hunters pwnd them all while they were typing "wow, nice wolf"
    Current System - Ultra Budget <$550 (Reused: 19" monitor, KB and mouse)
    Case: Xion Echo $50 PSU: Antec EarthWatts EA-500D $50
    Win 7 OEM: $99 HDD: Western Digital Caviar Blue 250GB 16MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s $45
    CPU/MB Combo: MSI 880GMA-E45 / Phenom II x3 720 2.8 (OC 3.5) $150
    GPU: MSI R5670 CYCLONE 1G Radeon HD 5670 $89
    Mem: G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB 1333 (pc10666) $45
    DVD Burner: Asus 24x $18
    - update: 2/16/11 added Hyper 212 CPU Cooler $30

  5. #125

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts


    So does this mean i have to do UBRS, ZG, MC, Ony, BWL, AQ20, AQ40, Kara, Mag, SSC, TK, BT, Sunwell, Naxx10, Naxx25, OS10, OS25, Eye10, and Eye25 before i'm "allowed" to enter Ulduar because everyone else did before i got there?
    [/quote]

    great great great point

  6. #126
    Herald of the Titans ElAmigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Orange Park, Fl
    Posts
    2,722

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Argden
    So riddle me this, sparky: If you, who has worked SO hard to get your gear decide to run a Naxx10 pug, and a fresh 80 who is decked out in blues asks to come, are you going to be the type of retard that says "this is a geared run" or "your gear sux" or some shit? Or are you going to take them?

    You see, people like you have this awesome cyclic argument. There are SO many idiots that demand people go through the same experiences you have, yet don't take people on lower-tier raid content precisely because they lack the gear you do. It's stupid and this is the situation that Blizzard has recognised a large amount of their player base is in.

    Case in point - my druid is running Ulduar with guild. But my mage alt, who has all the BiS pre-naxx heroic items + emblem gear + enchants + appropriate gemming cannot get a Naxx10 run because every retard says I'm under geared. After literally 2 months of trying, I get into a Naxx10 raid the other day and only because I begged. The only people who out dps'd me were the conq geared locks.

    Now I have 1700+ sp and most still won't take me (I won 3 pieces of Naxx10 gear). Instead they prefer to take the 2k geared mages that don't need the gear because "it's a fast run".

    I pay as much as anyone else to play this game. I have a char that is doing Uld. I know the fights for Naxx10. I'm more geared than any mage I ran Naxx10 with on my druid. I can pull more dps on my mage than ANYONE I ran Naxx10 with on my Druid. Thankfully, Blizzard has put a bit more thought into how they can help people in my situation. Thankfully, people like you aren't running the game, because you can be damn well sure that it wouldn't be nearly the success it is if you were. Why? You're an idiot.
    most productive and well thought out post i have ever read to be honest
    "Didn't we have some fun...though? Remember when the platform was sliding into the fire pit and I said 'Goodbye' and you were like 'No way' and then I was all 'We pretended we were going to murder you'......that was great"

  7. #127

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Quote Originally Posted by furydeath
    Or you could just have don't pvp on a pally or Death knight
    QQ hero class QQ

  8. #128
    Blademaster Hathor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    27

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Would be nice if there was a Frost Wyrm mount reward for PvE and not just PvP.

  9. #129

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    A Word of Warning to all you Worgen lovers - Blizzard are swinging Banhammers at anyone who is posting requests of reimplementation of the Worgen as a pet under the same clauses of previous pets such as the Slime.

    Account Banned

    Ban Type Temporary
    Expires 07/11/2009 10:04:41 AM PDT
    Ban Reason Other

    This account has been suspended from the World of Warcraft forums for a 72 hour period for posting about moderated threads. Threads may be deleted for violating Forum Guidelines, being redundant or to consolidate threads talking about the same issue.

    "
    * 0. Petition: Worgen pets restoration 07/08/2009 06:32:30 AM PDT

    Seeing my original post got deleted on the Customer Service forum within 2 minutes.... I'll try once here see if it's deleted. Before I paste my original post however, I read the post re: Worgen as a playable and while that holds a little water for me... they'd have to make the Worgen another hero class rather than choosing "warrior, shaman, shadowmage,etc" as classes.... as well as, they'd have to either have humanoid and worgen form, or they'd have to have a travel presence instead of a mount... for flying I'm not sure what we'd do.... maybe a flying disc or something to stand on. I support removing Worgen _IF_ Worgen are becoming a new playable... as long as Worgen are done right.... fist weapons only perhaps, and the ability to imbue your weapons similarly to Runeforging... but I get off topic

    I'm a shaman, I'm petitioning for the Hunter class to restore their Worgen pet. Any hunter who has already tamed this pet should indeed be allowed to keep it as a viable usable pet as was done with any and all other "limited time tames" in the game.

    Ghostwolf - Originally labelled the "Grimtotem Spirit Guide", this pet was summoned by a hostile mob and lived for 8 seconds (Tame Pet cast time is 20 secs). After several weeks of hunters frantically buying gear, recruiting friends (namely a shaman and a LWer if they were not one) to tame this elusive unique pet Blizzard decided to fix their mistake after being quoted that they were going to leave the Ghostwolf alone as a tamable pet. A brief hotfix removed the Grimtotem Spirit Guides from the game, HOWEVER hunters who had already spent the time to tame these pets were allowed to keep them.

    Hawkbane - Hawkbane was a little known about white tiger available from the start of Burning Crusade only until patch 2.1 when he was removed from the game. Blizzard never explained why this npc was removed from the game, although it's theorized that the revamp of Skettis conflicted with it's spawn points. Hunters were allowed to keep this pet, but the skin is not unique and shared by 2 other cat npcs.

    Death Ravager - This unique ravager skin is summoned from a level 10 Warrior quest, Alliance side. Another summoned beast that Blizzard has allowed to keep despite odd behaviors such as the hunter being the only person able to heal him, and sometimes glitchy pvp behavior. Despite these bugs, Hunters who tamed Death Ravager are allowed to keep him to this day, and Blizzard has not fixed the bugs related to him whereas he was never intended as a pet.

    Hunting Windroc - These strange behaving birds were abundant in Nagrand shortly after Burning Crusade's launch and would 'randomly' dive-bomb talbuks. Sometime before patch 2.3 these birds were removed from the game in a similar fashion as Hawkbane, with no explanation given. Also like Hawkbane, thankfully there are other brown and black owl skins available at the moment.

    Amongst the changes to Dustwallow Marsh it should also be mentioned that a number of normal pets were fully removed from the game. Any owners of the original tames were allowed to keep these as well.

    On the appropriate PTR the Amani Warbear was tamable, although when the patch went live the beast was not. This skin is not that far removed from the Shattered Hand Warhound which also has the saddle and bags and such, but is tamable by any hunter that wishes to get one.

    Torgos, a green carrion bird was tamable on the Burning Crusade beta, although was removed for seemingly no reason while regular carrion in the area are still tamable to this day.

    Though kind of a silly concept, worth mentioning none the less is the Arctic Grizzly Cub in Dragonblight was tamable during the Lich King beta, but was also removed when the game launched.

    These 3 while tamable at one point, were removed taking their unique skins with them.

    Sandfury Guardian - These green snakes were originally removed from the Hunter 'tame' list, but then readded. Previous to patch 1.3 these snakes were considered 'Wind Serpents' and were tamable, although were quickly removed only to be readded as a tamable pet with patch 2.0. The original skills had changed, though the pet was tamable again. Hunters who had tamed him back before patch 1.3 were allowed to keep him throughout it's removal from being a pet.

    Blizzard has also allowed hunters to keep other previously "oopsed" pets that were originally not designed to be tamed. Two examples of this are both "Crocolisks" by nature. The ghostly hydra that is summoned during the Oracles dailies was originally tamable, although with patch 3.0.8 he was removed from being tamable and once again hunters were allowed to keep him. Also related to the hydra would be the albino crocolisk who also previous to patch 3.0.8 was tamable, was patched in 3.0.8 to not allow him to be tamed and hunters who had him were allowed to keep him. Both of these pets had their skins removed from hunter options with these changes and are no longer available in any way for hunter pets.

    Final example of a pet that should never be allowed, although has been permitted to be kept, was strangely enough another Oracles dailies quest mob that also behaves as a Crocolisk. Previous to patch 3.0.8 hunters could tame a slime... yes a SLIME as a pet. This Slime has the classic green bubbling skin with the skull inside and weapons and such sticking out of him, but behaves as a crocolisk does. After patch 3.0.8 hunters were allowed to keep this pet for some reason, but no further tames were allowed.

    All of this needed to be pointed out before making a valid argument for Hunter Worgen pets.

    Many times in the past, Blizzard has either quietly patched in a pet to allow players some variety and some scouting for viable options in search of that one pet that will set them aside from everyone else, or has simply slipped up and forgot to encode something and players benefitted from a unique pet because of it. Over the last week there has been a large number of hunters out in Howling Fjord taming this unique 'Worg', ok his skin isn't a classic worg, but he 'behaves and reacts exactly as a' worg does which in turn makes him a worg. There was a blue post a few days ago made stating that Blizzard was intending to remove the Worg-en from being tamed during patch 3.2 but was swiftly deleted and now the hunter community knows why.

    Unlike every other pet that Blizzard has implemented then removed, the Worgen has lost it's skills, talent tree, and has been removed from 'valid pet mechanics'. Even the Serpent before 2.0 was still a pet, though couldn't be fed so was rarely used for fear of it abandoning it's master. Blizzard has removed the Worgen from new tames but has also robbed hunters who have already tamed him and in some cases having already abandoning other retired pets to obtain him.

    Blizzard, will you restore abandoned pets to these hunters if they ask?

    Likely the answer to this is no, as abandoning a pet is a player controlled action, but abandoning a pet to tame another then having that pet removed still has you left with no pet and is arguably not your fault that you have no pet.

    The largest argument against Worgen as hunter pets have been that they are sentient beings, therefore would rebel from the taming and wouldn't allow anyone to tame or control them.
    Exhibit A: Loque'nahak - the mate to a God. First off, this beast is the mate to a sentient talking Snow Leopard... what validation is there in saying that this beast, or it's mate would allow you to live while taming, or trying to control it.

    "But but Worgen are humanoids"
    Ordinarily yes, but in the case of Garwal you're wrong. Garwal when tamed is considered a beast, a wolf specifically and reacts, talents, growls, etc all exactly like a wolf. The fact that he is displayed with armor is irrelevent.

    "But Worgen aren't from Azeroth, how can they be a pet"
    Neither are warlock pets, and arguably ghouls but yet they are allowed due to class mechanics. Hunters have the exception where they can choose what they befriend which honestly should have been the case with warlocks....

    "But Worgen are sentient! Srsly!!"
    And how is a bubbling muck, a puddle of ooze, a SLIME tamable and controllable by a hunter? How does a hunter control a creature that simply reacts on base impulses in the same way that a bloodthirsty cursed creature such as the worg would?

    Quite simply, there is no validation in the removal of the Worgen as a pet beyond "It's our game we'll do it if we want to". The evidence is here to defend the hunters and to allow them to keep their Worgen pet as a full viable pet option. The only time that a pet has been removed and permanently stabled has had the pet readded at the begging request of the community.

    I'm here to petition, it's either the Worgen being readded, or the Slime burried.... you cannot validate removing the Worgen without addressing the similar argument behind the Slime 'crocolisk'.

    Slime - Behaves, talents, and skills as a crocolisk
    Worgen - Behaves, talents, and skills as a worg/wolf."
    Apparently Blizzard can't handle being told they goofed twice in 1 week.

  10. #130
    I am Murloc! Balduvian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,292

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Quote Originally Posted by xSaix
    Can someone ask why we can't feed him? It means I can never have him out or else he'll eventually run away.

    This is total bull.
    Why would you feed a pet nowadays? I never do that anymore with mend pet restoring him to 125% fast enough.

  11. #131

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynneth-Icecrown
    A Word of Warning to all you Worgen lovers - Blizzard are swinging Banhammers at anyone who is posting requests of reimplementation of the Worgen as a pet under the same clauses of previous pets such as the Slime.

    Apparently Blizzard can't handle being told they goofed twice in 1 week.
    My brain is arguing over this one

    1 - It's a frikking skin, wtf is the big deal? - either way - for Bliz, or Hunters.

    2 - As pointed out in the above post, it's happened before and this worgen is the first to get skrood over like this.

    I have one, and I'm keeping it. I spent 50g for a respec and I threw away a L80 pet, and spent like 4 hours trying to tame him in bewteen lots of other hunters that came and went. It was a pretty epic tame, because of the split second timing required, and there was no formula to follow because everyone has a different haste rating and Wyvern damage ticks. If history repeats itself, the worgen will be back sooner or later. At the very least I can scare old ladies with it by taking him out for a quick stroll once a month or so. Hell, I have a useless Devilsaur stuck in my stable as well from when I expirimented with BM. He can't get out unless I respec, and BM sux so it would just be to release him anyway. I'd rather lose the stable slot than spend 100g to spec into BM and then out of it again. Luckily hunters only need one stable slot atm anyway, just to switch bewteen the PvE mandatory wolf type (that every hunter in the universe has), and the PvP pet of choice. It's not like any other pets are useful in any way.
    Current System - Ultra Budget <$550 (Reused: 19" monitor, KB and mouse)
    Case: Xion Echo $50 PSU: Antec EarthWatts EA-500D $50
    Win 7 OEM: $99 HDD: Western Digital Caviar Blue 250GB 16MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s $45
    CPU/MB Combo: MSI 880GMA-E45 / Phenom II x3 720 2.8 (OC 3.5) $150
    GPU: MSI R5670 CYCLONE 1G Radeon HD 5670 $89
    Mem: G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB 1333 (pc10666) $45
    DVD Burner: Asus 24x $18
    - update: 2/16/11 added Hyper 212 CPU Cooler $30

  12. #132

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Quote Originally Posted by TanAxys
    My brain is arguing over this one

    1 - It's a frikking skin, wtf is the big deal? - either way - for Bliz, or Hunters.

    2 - As pointed out in the above post, it's happened before and this worgen is the first to get skrood over like this.

    I have one, and I'm keeping it. I spent 50g for a respec and I threw away a L80 pet, and spent like 4 hours trying to tame him in bewteen lots of other hunters that came and went. It was a pretty epic tame, because of the split second timing required, and there was no formula to follow because everyone has a different haste rating and Wyvern damage ticks. If history repeats itself, the worgen will be back sooner or later. At the very least I can scare old ladies with it by taking him out for a quick stroll once a month or so. Hell, I have a useless Devilsaur stuck in my stable as well from when I expirimented with BM. He can't get out unless I respec, and BM sux so it would just be to release him anyway. I'd rather lose the stable slot than spend 100g to spec into BM and then out of it again. Luckily hunters only need one stable slot atm anyway, just to switch bewteen the PvE mandatory wolf type (that every hunter in the universe has), and the PvP pet of choice. It's not like any other pets are useful in any way.
    Keep it, Blizzard isn't making you get rid of it, just don't expect to put talents into it. It was never intended to be tamed because it's a humanoid, not a simple beast. Unlike every other pet in the past, this one is intelligent and sapient as well as sentient.

  13. #133

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Hathor
    Would be nice if there was a Frost Wyrm mount reward for PvE and not just PvP.
    Yeh, that would be pretty good imo, whether it be from the Argent Colosseum shizzness or anything else.

  14. #134

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynneth-Icecrown
    A Word of Warning to all you Worgen lovers - Blizzard are swinging Banhammers at anyone who is posting requests of reimplementation of the Worgen as a pet under the same clauses of previous pets such as the Slime.

    Apparently Blizzard can't handle being told they goofed twice in 1 week.
    I just posted this on Official EU (read ignored for the most by Blizzard), see how long it stays up and if I get banned.

    http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread....23042595&sid=1

    # So, I'd like my pet back please

    Yup, I had to abandon a pet to get the pet who's name we can't mention because certain people who ahem, work around here seem to be going on a banning spree because they feel this issue it a sore point (Wonder why that is...)

    So, should I choose to do so, and being as you give us little choice because of the manner you handled this situation, if I abandon the pet who's name we can't mention would you give me back the pet I had to abandon to get it, in fact could you?

    As it stands I lost out on one pet to tame another, now you rendered that pet useless when it was in fact a proper Hunters pet with abilities and talents when I got it, because I got it for those once it came out you could get it. Yes I made a choice to do so, but so did you when you decided to castrate this pet in the way you did in such haste it cannot have been properly thought out.

    Before the whole "it was this or that and blah blah" tirade of if it was a mistake, a bug or an exploit starts, the point is most if not all hunters who took this pet only did so because of how the majority of other pets that came about like this did by someone seeing a chance to gain something unusual rather than for any malicious of game breaking reasons or exploits. You encourage players to be creative and look for the unusual, such as Rare creatures and the like. Most Hunters played along with that especially with the previous unusual pets that have been introduced into the game and the way they were handled, they obviously thought that this one was going to be dealt with in the same manner.

    None of the current reasons given why we can't have the pet stand to reason, lore, please Cows from Space figured right into WoW lore, right? Can't tame Humanoids, where do Ghouls come from Mummy? Wasn't meant to be tamed, your mistake, your fault, don't be peevish about Hunters using their initiative when you encourage us to do so and seek out rare or exotic pets.

    Now you have not played it the way you previously have done and chose to go a whole different route some of us have lost a "working" pet a gained something that isn't even a vanity pet because we are penalised if we keep it because we lose a pet stable slot and have to go to strange lengths to keep it happy, can't use it to Hunt with so it's not a "working" pet. Add to that the cash many of us spent to respec to capture "it", as well as the time taken to Tame "It".

    Yes, it is your game and you will do as you see fit, we as paying customers are VERY aware of that, you show us often enough. Considering that Blue posts about this vanished which stated the pet wasn't getting touched till the next patch (More than a few sources state this and witnessed the posts for it to be just crap) the way you handled this situation is utterly shocking and I as a paying customer am disgusted something so fundamentally trivial as this in the grand scheme of things was dealt with so quickly when this game has MASSES of far more pressing issues deserving of immediate attention that get left for months and months without so much as a hotfix. We get fobbed off with the usual "The Devs are aware of this issue and it is being looked into, thank you for making us aware of this!" generic flannel.

    However, I as a paying customer have the right to air my views (yes here in public because that is what these forums are for - and if not a Blue response with the correct place or E-Mail address where I can do so would be appreciated) and also as I feel like I have had my gameplay affected I want something to be righted which you wronged. More importantly I am disgusted at how the money you take from me every month is being spent when this kind of thing shows such flagrant misuse of Dev/Coders time fixing something minor when larger issues are just left to fester for long periods of time.


    So, the bottom line is, take the pet that shall not be named away, give me my old Pet back and I also want my Talent Point respec costs covering, I'll let you off with the time I spent getting the pet as I got it rather fast and didn't waste much time from my usual daily gaming, thanks muchly.
    http://www.wintergrasp.co.uk

  15. #135

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Thedann
    Keep it, Blizzard isn't making you get rid of it, just don't expect to put talents into it. It was never intended to be tamed because it's a humanoid, not a simple beast. Unlike every other pet in the past, this one is intelligent and sapient as well as sentient.
    blah blah blah... same rhetoric

    it isn't intelligent, sentient, sapient or anything else... it's a video game mob, that behaves like a wolf, that happened to be tamable. These arguments are all a bunch of crap. Every player has access to a pet "Orphan" or "Squire"... actual children as pets--that's way worse than a werewolf. The only thing that mattered to any hunter was the appearance. The most viable PvE pet we have right now is a wolf. Every SV and MM raiding hunter is using a wolf. A lot of BM hunters are even using wolves, because the Devilsaur is too irritating to be worth the marginal DPS gain over the wolf.

    That's what the outcry is about... no one really gave a rats ass about the other pets like the slime or hydra... because they were just mostly vanity pets anyway because crocolisks suck.

    For 1 brief shining night there was a chance to get a rare looking pet, that could actually be used on a regular basis to raid with. Now for all of the dumb ass reasons about walking on 2 legs, and looking like a humanoid race and whatever else all the detractors have speculated about.. it's gone. Now every hunter is back to using the same wolves every other hunter has.

    The bottom line is rather than fix the pet to take away whatever amazing OP advantage it had, that Blizz was sooo concerned about, they chose to make the pet worthless. If Blizz would quit farting around with beasts and program them right the first time, then hunters wouldn't get their hopes up every time a new creature pops up. How hard would it be to make the special creatures out there elite? Then Bliz could make them do whatever they want, and then when they got tamed they'd lose their elite status, and revert to a normal version of the pet with the same skin.

    It's all a load of crap, and really nothing worth crying about. Just another slip up by Blizz and a half-fast fix.
    Current System - Ultra Budget <$550 (Reused: 19" monitor, KB and mouse)
    Case: Xion Echo $50 PSU: Antec EarthWatts EA-500D $50
    Win 7 OEM: $99 HDD: Western Digital Caviar Blue 250GB 16MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s $45
    CPU/MB Combo: MSI 880GMA-E45 / Phenom II x3 720 2.8 (OC 3.5) $150
    GPU: MSI R5670 CYCLONE 1G Radeon HD 5670 $89
    Mem: G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB 1333 (pc10666) $45
    DVD Burner: Asus 24x $18
    - update: 2/16/11 added Hyper 212 CPU Cooler $30

  16. #136

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    so is this pet not tameable now on EU servers ?

  17. #137

    Re: Worgen Pet, Gladiators Wyrms, 3.2 Item Comparison, Blue posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Naoto
    Are addons for people lacking common sense? why waste your time doing maths when the game does it for you?

    Anyone know if there's a reason why the EU maintenance is down from 3AM CET to 1PM CET? never usualy that long.
    pity, this 'feature' they are introducing, is nothing like ratingbuster.

    ie: it will not provide a summary of mp5(or ofsr) gained from stats like intellect & spirit or the effects on those stats by any talents your toon has.

    defense is another aspect this 'feature' blizzard fails at too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •