Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
5
... LastLast
  1. #41

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by Daez
    Here is the issue plain and simple. No two classes whine more than mages and warlocks (well maybe rogues), but the second shadow priests can do the same damage if not (SHOCK) more damage than a mage or a warlock Blizzard will be spammed with "but I'm a pure dps" all over their forums and they don't really want to deal with it. Shadow priests are supposed to be a hybrid, and Blizzard strings them along as "playable" although the majority of the population thinks shadow priests should just respec healing.
    No, bad players who happen to play pure DPS classes would whine but they would whine regardless and Blizzard knows this.

    Shadow Priests need buffs as do half the "DPS" specs in the game. Unfortunately, IMO the currently under performing DPS specs are SOL for the rest of wrath and really should just respec/reroll to something that's not hip-deep in UP powers until Cataclysm hits.

    With the introduction of Masteries Blizzard has painted themselves into a corner where spec performance is concerned and will be forced to review/overhaul every class in the game.

    I'd leave the UP specs where they were unless there was an easy tweak we could use to console them here or there until it was time to actually review them too. If you've got to do the dirty deed eventually, might as well try to do it right once. There's no real reason to spend the manpower to do the (in some cases extremely low level and intensive) changes necessary to balance some of these specs when you'd just have to do them again in a few months.

  2. #42

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    I like how when they first nerfed BM from 3.0. they also nerfed the damage of SS by 10% as part of the nerf... cause the one button macro of godliness was too much. But IF this change is right, BM not only gets that 10% to SS back, but they also get 10% more to other things as well.


    Things that make you go hmm.

  3. #43

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by Fraz
    Sweet BM Buff (Still not enough)

    It will not be enough until BM's have a shot at being somewhat respected. . . .

    I want to feel like I have a chance in heck of being able to pug. But alas my confidence is depressingly low right now in that aspect. :-(

  4. #44

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by Malfuron
    It's NOT a god-damn nerf, read the talent properly before you start commenting. You gain 10% damage at ALL times when specced into this talent, and when you use Bestial Wrath, you gain an ADDITIONAL 10%
    And once the actual talent is linked, perhaps you'll have a point, but the linked version is the live version.

    Until we have exact wording, I'm not buying into shit.
    Signature removed. Please read our guidelines. Venara

  5. #45
    High Overlord
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    197

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by Charo
    So... you want Omen of Clarity from a set bonus, no thanks, 2% is what druids got for their 2pc8, live with it. >>
    Didn't know about that, but it must be something seriously wrong with the setbonus since 99% of all Rogues keep their 4-set bonus from t8 since it weights out the stat increase from ilvl 232 and 245 of what I've read around Rogue forums and such.

    226 -> 232 should be nothing more than pure upgrade, correct me if I'm wrong? (set wise, not widewise with stats)
    -.-

  6. #46

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by qae
    Frost tanks get a nice threat boost with Tot including RS.. and really UA was not that good to begin with..
    Not to nit pick, but you mean frost DW tanks get a nice boost, and I'm not sure how many people have come accustomed to DW tanking. Its definitely doable now, especially with a lot of bosses getting that parry gib thing turned off, but I'm not sure if its that extremely popular yet.
    I used to be hardcore, then I discovered how fun it is to get laid on an almost daily basis. I'll take sex over WoW any day, so now I'm casual.

  7. #47

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by Rilgon
    And once the actual talent is linked, perhaps you'll have a point, but the linked version is the live version.

    Until we have exact wording, I'm not buying into shit.
    Check the PTR talent calculators from the front page.

    "Increases all damage you deal by 10% and while your pet is under the effects of Bestial Wrath, you also go into a rage causing 10% additional damage and reducing mana costs of all spells by 20% for 10 sec. While enraged, you do not feel pity or remorse or fear and you cannot be stopped unless killed."

  8. #48

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by Vashdakari
    I like how when they first nerfed BM from 3.0. they also nerfed the damage of SS by 10% as part of the nerf... cause the one button macro of godliness was too much. But IF this change is right, BM not only gets that 10% to SS back, but they also get 10% more to other things as well.


    Things that make you go hmm.
    At the time, BM was doing ungodly damage. Now, its dragging in damage. Its not that they did to much damage back then its just that they did more damage than everything else. Everything else has pretty much been buffed (including MM and Surv), so now bringing them back to where they were doesn't make them look as overpowered.
    I used to be hardcore, then I discovered how fun it is to get laid on an almost daily basis. I'll take sex over WoW any day, so now I'm casual.

  9. #49

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Why i dont see Ret Tier9 2p bonus fixed on that list ? I thought it works on PTR...

  10. #50

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by Deathgasm
    Didn't know about that, but it must be something seriously wrong with the setbonus since 99% of all Rogues keep their 4-set bonus from t8 since it weights out the stat increase from ilvl 232 and 245 of what I've read around Rogue forums and such.
    Careful what you wish for. Most likely Blizzard will fix this in their usual way. Incoming nerf to T8 4 piece bonus. Fixed!
    I used to be hardcore, then I discovered how fun it is to get laid on an almost daily basis. I'll take sex over WoW any day, so now I'm casual.

  11. #51

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Nice to see they're doing something about Hunter dps. Though I don't think a permanent +10% buff to BM will close the gap between it and MM. It'll help, yes, but I certainly doubt it'll pull ahead. Which is a good thing, in a way, I guess.
    Quote Originally Posted by Crocstar
    My personal belief is that whoever plays a hunter in the arena testing they have done since season 1 is just a monster, skilled beyond all belief and manages to whomp on the testers playing other classes. They in turn nerf hunters each and every patch to close the gap on this superhuman hunter demigod.... Slow down on the skills man, we don't stand a chance now and we can't take much more of the nerf bat.

  12. #52
    Moderator Synthaxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Rotherham, England/UK
    Posts
    10,528

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by justinh
    Quick on the bm nerf yet prot holy paladins still reign supreme gg blizz you know all about balancing the game
    Welcome to "Initial patch 3.2.2 build notes". Jeez, Gotta love people who completely ignore changes THAT HAVE BEEN IN SINCE THE FIRST BUILD.

  13. #53

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by Rilgon
    And once the actual talent is linked, perhaps you'll have a point, but the linked version is the live version.

    Until we have exact wording, I'm not buying into shit.
    So we have an uncertain talent from a PTR built and you consider it completely normal to think it will be a nerf but it is shit to actually choose to interpret the text as a buff when it could easily go either way and blizzard has said BM needs to be buffed? Yeah . . .

  14. #54

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Wow haha, talking about trashing DK tanking, lmao its almost useless now, yet they have buffed shield block so much, that classes with shield can solo tank heroics, Blizzard dont do drugs :
    R.I.P World of Warcraft 2004-2009 The Casuals whiners finally killed you, one wonders how casuals can overcome reallife, they must cry alot at work and out in the big world, when stuff is to hard and time consuming. Maybe god will helps casual scrubs handle real life? nobody knows.

  15. #55

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by StitchMonkey
    It will not be enough until BM's have a shot at being somewhat respected. . . .

    I want to feel like I have a chance in heck of being able to pug. But alas my confidence is depressingly low right now in that aspect. :-(
    yeah I can imagine how it feels ;D

    You : Hunter up
    RL : Surv or mark?
    You : BM
    RL : Ok but what's you PVE spec?
    You : erm.. BM
    RL : lolz
    You : ..
    RL : sorry raid members tell me we got enough hunters already.
    You : ...
    You : /logout
    *French guy inside*
    *please forgive my poor english*

  16. #56

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by StitchMonkey

    It will not be enough until BM's have a shot at being somewhat respected. . . .

    I want to feel like I have a chance in heck of being able to pug. But alas my confidence is depressingly low right now in that aspect. :-(
    BM just needs a signature Shot just like Explosive Shot or Chimera and.. BM is fun to play again.

  17. #57

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by RMJ
    Wow haha, talking about trashing DK tanking, lmao its almost useless now, yet they have buffed shield block so much, that classes with shield can solo tank heroics, Blizzard dont do drugs :
    How do you see that its useless? All the abilities are going back to 1 minute timers (down from 2 minutes). Sure, they are getting balanced a little. Here is the little problem with shield block tanking. SHIELD BLOCK DOES NOTHING TO PREVENT MAGICAL DAMAGE! Seeing the vast majority of bosses in Uld and TOC have a crap load of magical damage you want a tank that can take that damage. That normally leaves you with two options. You can either go druid (because they still have the highest possible health pool even after the paladin buffs and still have the second highest damage reduction) or DKS that now have the second highest hit point pool and the highest possible reduction (which actually gets buffed due to changes to frost presence and being able to chain cool downs).
    I used to be hardcore, then I discovered how fun it is to get laid on an almost daily basis. I'll take sex over WoW any day, so now I'm casual.

  18. #58

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Quote Originally Posted by qae
    yeah I can imagine how it feels ;D

    You : Hunter up
    RL : Surv or mark?
    You : BM
    RL : Ok but what's you PVE spec?
    You : erm.. BM
    RL : lolz
    You : ..
    RL : sorry raid members tell me we got enough hunters already.
    You : ...
    You : /logout
    While this is funny, the biggest reason people hate pet classes is umm the pet. BM chooses to forgo personal dps to add pet dps. Of course they are going to be hated. The only reason they weren't hated in TBC and early wrath is because they did insanely more dps than the other specs. Until that happens again people will still want MM or Surv simply because they don't like watching someones dps drop by 1000 or more every time their pet dies, and we all know pets LOVE dieing.
    I used to be hardcore, then I discovered how fun it is to get laid on an almost daily basis. I'll take sex over WoW any day, so now I'm casual.

  19. #59

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    Um ok, guess i have an extra glyph slot on my elemental shaman now >.> Really unexpected change
    Hopefully "at least" means "sometimes three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number flame shock shall tick, and the number of ticking shall be three. Four shalt thou not tick, nor either tick thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou holy lava burst of antioch towards thy foe, who being naughty in my sight, shall suffer at least two more ticks of flame shock. Amen."
    :3* -Whowherewhat

  20. #60

    Re: Patch 3.2 PTR Build 10433

    I don't know if I should be happy or sad about the battleground queue change.
    Quote Originally Posted by Parynziux
    So, you are clearly the biggest nerf to your class. Hush.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •