I'm sure you've all noticed that every new team these days gets a fancy -cleave name. First it was just melee cleave, or cleave. Probably warrior-ret-holy pally in season 5. Switch the ret for a DK and it's shadowcleave.
Enhance + Warrior + healer = BEASTCLEAVE. I lol'd when i heard this one.
Enhance + bmhunter + healer = zoocleave? am I getting these right?
Now you've got elemental - destro - healer for Wizardcleave. I mean, I laughed, but elementals arent very wizardly, it would make more sense as mage-lock-heals, but then again, the spirit is there, the exact participants dont matter, it's 2x caster DPS. Also know as Spellcleave.
The other offshoot is -play. I want to say, shadowpriest-lock-healer would be shadowplay? I didn't much favor this term but hey whatev. the comp didnt catch on either.
The question is, why cleave? in the beginning, i could sort of see it. Warrior sweeping strikes, bladestorm, possible even cleave but probably not, all hitting multiple targets, divine storm hits multiples, "cleave" sort of works. But in current usage it's pretty much just taken to be [somewhat descriptive word]-cleave, where cleave means, "blows something up fast."
Other arena team naming conventions are the abbreviations. RLS and RMP work very well, they arent thematically descriptive but they are pretty solidified in the lingo at the moment. I tend to say "RMP," but PMR, otherwise pronounced "peemer" is humorous too.
I guess it's just hard for new teams to make such big waves that they end up with their own names. I just wish that when they did, they could get original names instead of x-cleave. I think the cleaves came about because it is kind of funny to apply that terminology to "wizards" or "zoos," or what have you, but I can't help but think we can do better, or at least be more specific.
P.S., when announcing, in 2s, that we are fighting "ret-rogue," i can't help but laugh because when you say it fast it sounds like Scooby Doo saying "uh oh." which is what you'll be saying too when they start in on you. :P