Best Paladin in the world is...

[Exera]

It still amazes me that people actually think he is serious and not just acting out a role... Truly amazing.

[bullseyed]

you have yours saying the other way? :P

You must be unfamiliar with how debate works. Burden of proof, etc.

[bullseyed]

So what u are saying is that GMs are over the entire rule of human error or a GM can simply not be wrong?

What I'm saying is if someone as a representative of a company makes a statement, the company should be legally bound to upholding it.

If I call from my phone at work and promise someone they can get ____ item at ____ price from the tier one distributer I work for, my company is going to have to uphold that price. I'd get fired, but they'd uphold the verbal contract.

In the situation as it happened, Blizzard acted unprofessionally and banned him anyway. *shrug*

[koljach]

I believe best paladin in the world is gaar

*hopes someone here will get it*

[belfpala]

What I'm saying is if someone as a representative of a company makes a statement, the company should be legally bound to upholding it.

If I call from my phone at work and promise someone they can get ____ item at ____ price from the tier one distributer I work for, my company is going to have to uphold that price. I'd get fired, but they'd uphold the verbal contract.

In the situation as it happened, Blizzard acted unprofessionally and banned him anyway. *shrug*

We have legal rights vested in our WoW characters? News to me!

[DaGhostDS]

I believe best paladin in the world is gaar

*hopes someone here will get it*

Greater Albuquerque Association of Realtors?
or
General anti-avoidance rule?
wait wtf..
John Gaar?

[zalz]

What I'm saying is if someone as a representative of a company makes a statement, the company should be legally bound to upholding it.

If I call from my phone at work and promise someone they can get ____ item at ____ price from the tier one distributer I work for, my company is going to have to uphold that price. I'd get fired, but they'd uphold the verbal contract.

In the situation as it happened, Blizzard acted unprofessionally and banned him anyway. *shrug*

Don't wanna get too involved here but just wanted to make a sidenote for everyone reading the post by this person.

He doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about and is lying on purpose or due to lack of understanding of how the real world works. Once again, his statement is false and should be ignored if you intent to live in the real world.

[belfpala]

Don't wanna get too involved here but just wanted to make a sidenote for everyone reading the post by this person.

He doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about and is lying on purpose or due to lack of understanding of how the real world works. Once again, his statement is false and should be ignored if you intent to live in the real world.

His statement isn't false at all. When an agent of a company makes a representation under the color of authority and in the scope of his duties, such a representation is most likely binding.

My argument, above, was simply that we have no legal interest in our Wow Characters. That's that.

[Iniquity]

It still amazes me that people actually think he is serious and not just acting out a role... Truly amazing.

It really is amazing, but hey atleast it shows what a good actor he really is since he fools so many stupid and ignorant people :P

[twinkleblur]

Live...

XD In bg's live.

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/athene

this is gonna get trolls too hard this post was a worst idea then blizzard making death knights a melee class...

[roboscorcher]

So what u are saying is that GMs are over the entire rule of human error or a GM can simply not be wrong?

If a cop told you that something was legal, and then the FBI arrest you for doing that thing, is that fair for them to do? Or are they being total bungholes?

Mob tagging is not an obviously immoral issue, unlike something like gold selling. It wasn't Athene's friends' error, they thought that they were following the rules. I wish MMO companies would investigate player intentions before throwing down the banhammer.

But yeah, as Athene said, Blizz does own the right to destroy all our accounts if they so please. It may not be moral, but they can legally do it.

[zalz]

His statement isn't false at all. When an agent of a company makes a representation under the color of authority and in the scope of his duties, such a representation is most likely binding.

My argument, above, was simply that we have no legal interest in our Wow Characters. That's that.

So you don't really know what your talking about either? Just don't comment then.