Just wanted to get a different community opinion on these two subjects.
Currently in discussion at EJ: http://elitistjerks.com/f80/t37900-d...ck_thread/p57/
Both involve ways of setting up the best Corruption possible. Tests have been done to see if recasting Corruption sub 35% will give you the bonus of Death's Embrace, which seemed to prove positive. If you use NMiC, this means repopping the trinket and recasting Corr just under 35%, (+ TotT if you can get a rogue) to get the bonus.
While this isn't complicated in itself, combined with the T10 proc, and the juggling begins. The bonus from the proc can be rolled with Corruption as well, so people are trying to figure out the best possible way to take advantage of it. Best case scenario being you use the same opener (pre combat everything) and get TotT/4pc T10 proc/NMiC in the first few seconds -> Corruption. What happens when you don't proc T10 right away though? Should you hold off NMiC to combine it with the T10 proc? Should you then open with UA to get more chances at a T10 proc earlier on? The opening rotation is currently under review to get the most out of a better rolling Corruption, with the RNG of a proc from your tier gear, and possibly dealing with a SP proc too (DFO/Lightweave leads to casting a Seed to dispel your current Corruption due to the "More powerful" effect).
At what point does it get complicated enough that screwing with our well known and well timed opener will result in a DPS loss attempting to stack buffs based on RNG? While I totally agree that should it all go down like it's supposed to, it's higher DPS, but 1 slip in lining up on uses and procs could make the whole effort null, not to mention the actual fight mechanics going on around you.
This all happens again sub 35%, where you want a T10 proc/TotT/NMiC to line up.
I've heard the argument that T10 will proc more often than we expect, so maybe we can count on it happening during our ramp up time. What are your opinions on the matter?