View Poll Results: Which of the games do you think had the best story/gameplay?

Voters
2. You may not vote on this poll
  • Call of Duty : World at War

    2 100.00%
  • Medal of Honor : Pacific Assault

    0 0%
  • I just watch The Pacific on HBO

    0 0%
  1. #1

    Medal of Honor : Pacific Assault VS Call of Duty : World at War

    Personaly i think Medal of Honor had a much more immersive story and enviroment. (You saved people in the water, off of a boat. Now that's real war immersion!)
    As i felt Call of Duty : World at War, was very fast paced and seemed like it just wanted to be over with. (Though it had some awesome moments)

  2. #2
    Epic! Fysi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    South UK
    Posts
    1,609

    Re: Medal of Honor : Pacific Assault VS Call of Duty : World at War

    Allied Assualt > all
    Must... resist... posting... huge... animated GIF...

  3. #3

    Re: Medal of Honor : Pacific Assault VS Call of Duty : World at War

    Pacific Assault? didn't that come out in 2006 or 7? Either way, it looked nice, but it didn't run so swell on the computer.

    World at war to me seemed to paint a bigger consistent picture of "War is hell" than even the rest of the series.

    As for Allied Assault? Omaha Beach sure scared the hell out of me. It was kind of the selling point (thanks to the gaming magazines) to it. Every other time though you felt like Superman with a Thompson.
    Quote Originally Posted by Respen
    I was very disappointed in the screenshots. I usually base my entire gaming experience around ground textures and so far it seems like Cata will be totally unplayable.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •