Darnassus is by far the most good looking alliance city.
Pandaren drinking down dorfs ftw.
Darnassus is by far the most good looking alliance city.
Pandaren drinking down dorfs ftw.
""I'm not trying to say that clunkiness is a good cost for an ability. What I am trying to say is that if we just wanted Spell Reflect or whatever to be super easy to use that we would take away the shield requirement or just have it auto-switch to a shield. Being able to pull it off at the right time is the hallmark of a great warrior. If you watch some of these really skilled players play, yeah I'd argue their intuition does seem to border on ESP""
It would be an awsome change if they made Spell reflect useable without shield. To equip the shield + then reflect makes a small delay.
Same thing for shield bash they should make a new Silence for battle stance so u doint have to switch stance or go sword and board to shield bash
What the hell are they talking about? There are no Str 1h weapons available in ICC. Do they mean tanking weapons? Do they mean going forward into cata because there are absolutely none available in current content.
Loooking at that picture just reminds me of Warcraft 3.
"I'll put it on your tab"
Woop, concept arts are from WoWTCG.
New and new, but still awesome to see them beeeg!
EDIT: Wallpapers and wallpapers.
I kinda like this but im still not sure.
We still love you boub :P
"Friends don't let friends be gnomes."
That post about hunters..
"I may have spoken too soon on Counterattack. Just today we discussed keeping it and getting rid of Mongoose instead. There are some legit PvP uses of hunter melee attacks, so long as the class doesn't feel like it's supposed to be a melee-ranged hybrid. You're ranged."
Does anyone at blizz even play a hunter?
I'm liking the shiv idea, as long as it still does what it currently does. Shiv is still useful in certain situations. In pvp when my DP stack is about to fall off I'll shiv it back on, or when an enemy rogue is doing evasion+sprint I'll shiv wound/crip to slow him down. I hope they don't gut the old ability simply to give us an enrage dispeller which, quite frankly, I don't really use that often, and in pve our melee enrage-dispeller will always be inferior to the ranged tranq shot.
interesting alliance v. alliance consept or horde v. horde. i remember a post a while back about merging horde and allaince people really HATED the idea. i dont see this being much different. imo there making all the factions play toghter there are benifiets to this, as well as non benifeits. imo i see more bonuses with it then anything else.
Don't like Alliance vs. Alliance battlegrounds. It's one of the main reasons I don't like arena. Plus if there aren't horrific queue times for Horde, what's to stop everyone faction changing for ez wins... I mean, even more than they already have.
Although I've seen some warriors pulling crazy numbers, there arent that many running around to begin with. Looks like there will be even less come Cata.