Lol tyvm! Honestly this entire thread was a fluke of mine, I just assumed that because there were actual screenshots of this on the Blizzard website (http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/catac...grimbatol.html) under the Cata preview that they weren't Alpha, but apparently they are and that makes perfect sense!
Does Blizzard usually release pictures that are still using placeholder models?
No? Didnt think so.
The pictures are "pretty much" what we can expect.
Not a huge deal, just Blizzard cutting costs/production time.
News | Forum Guidelines | MMO Champion IRC | Free Games List
Playing: Guild Wars 2 | APB: Reloaded
-I don't care what the next expansion is about, as long as the story is dark and rich so I can refer to it as Chocolate WoW.
tbh i liked the old models(the gronns and the reskinned vezax lookin thing)
and you expect new models for every xpac? its the same world, just different places, get over it
Last edited by smartAXE; 2010-06-21 at 04:45 AM. Reason: forgot half my post
PlayStation suporter.
fb_Scud / RPG-HAD
If everything was changed to be new models then there wouldn't be the lore feel for the game.
It sucks, but it's the truth.
You go make Grim Batol a crazy ass Dungeon with new everything, and then tell me that the Wildhammer dwarfs built it? No way. But on the other hand Deathwing could have totally ripped the place apart and made it home.
To bad it's not the latter.
I have lost all hope in Blizzard. It's pathetic how they make their game(s) these days.
I was a Death's Demise.
Those were the good old days.