Cataclysm Last Expansion?

[Hyde]

I don't see the "I think this topic is retarded" option.

[xxAkirhaxx]

I don't see the "I think this topic is retarded" option.

It's hidden over the top of the X button on the top right of your web browser. Did you vote?

[Hyde]

It's hidden over the top of the X button on the top right of your web browser. Did you vote?

Are you hitting on me? because that is not the way I roll., BABEH.

[koimagheul]

Blizzard said the last cap will be 100 before.

they once said that if ever had an encounter with LK, it wouldn't be before lvl100, so I wouldn't take anything they say about any cap for granted.

This list was datamined during the beta of Vanilla wow, if I'm not mistaken.

you are. this list is a fake.

[Zhira]

Missed this part?

Yes I did, sorry . Only read the article quickly.

[Jekyll]

short answer; no

long answer; No siree

[Asheowyn]

... And really, would we just ignore the Burning Legion? "OK guys. Deathwings dead. Everyone is safe. Time to retire! gg" ... No. Just no. Acting like Cata is the end makes a long time WoW player think you may have joined in Wrath and don't know/care about the lore at all.

Part of the problem why the (server) community has been dumbing down a bit imo
But on topic; No. lol.

[Destruktion]

here's the creator and origin of the list link. its fake and he admitted to lucky guesses. http://wow.allakhazam.com/forum.html...e=1&howmany=50

The list originated on the WoW forums.

Although some of the things on that linked list were apparently added by the poster for lulz, that were absent from the actual list.

[Kichiro]

2012 is the last exp. because its the end of the world...of warcraft :P

[ChildeRoland]

With cataclysm, Blizzard almost creates a whole new game, minus 20 levels which stays as before. Also, they better the graphical effects within the world. Probably, they will keep making graphics better in the future, and hopefully they will also edit the leveling experience from 58-78 within the next expansions. WoW still has a insanely high player base, so there is no need for blizzard to stop making it better.

[Deleted]

Blizzard said the last cap will be 100 before.

"The cataclysm level cap is 5 more levels because we want to be able to add more content before level 100."
Does not equal to:
"The cataclysm level cap is 5 more levels because 100 is the last cap and we want to add more content before that."

And since people misunderstood the first statement, blues have also stepped up to reassure something along these lines:
"We have no plans to stop developing World of Warcraft when you reach level 100, as opposed to how some players misinterpreted our previous statement. We just don't feel we want to get to a in many gamers' minds special number in two mere expansion sets."

No, those aren't definitive quotes but exactly what they said in different words. Yes, I know I'm right. No, I can't bother sourcing it - and since you called the first claim to quotation, the burden of proof is on you either way.

[Vasti]

not sure how long it will go on. But they said they wanted to update outland and wotlk too in a future expac.

so this is DEFINITLY not the last one.

Ashara will at least get another expac. She would make a small appearance in cata, but she would be killed in another expac.

[Tonkaden]

Also to you, it wont be a Starcraft MMO, Blizz said at blizcon last year that the new mmo was completly ORIGINAL, meaning a whole new concept... not based on old crap

Here you go.



- It's not going to be a WoW expansion.
- It will be based on a brand new IP (new story & lore).
- Several people of the WoW team have joined Next Gen MMO's team.
- This MMO targets to a broader audience than WoW.
- Clues from job ads indicate that it will be a Science Fiction/Sci Fi MMO. In the past Kaplan, who revealed he is involved in the project, was asked if the game's genre would be science fiction, post-apocalyptic, or historical, and while laughing he responded: "all of those combined!
- Currently it's believed that the unannounced MMO will have elements from FPS (Shooting MMO)while probably it will use a third person point of view. Even if that is the case, the characterization "Next Gen" implies that it won't be similar to anything we know so far.

[Deleted]

No..jsut get it.There will AT LEAST be one more.They wont let out Sargeras and Titans for 100% so you got your answer that there will be at least 1 more.
The only option would be if 99% would stop playing wow so how much possible is that?
Please stop posting threads, which were 2times this week and more then 5 times the last month posted already it doesnt give you more infos at all..

---------- Post added 2010-10-07 at 01:52 PM ----------

"The cataclysm level cap is 5 more levels because we want to be able to add more content before level 100."
Does not equal to:
"The cataclysm level cap is 5 more levels because 100 is the last cap and we want to add more content before that."

And since people misunderstood the first statement, blues have also stepped up to reassure something along these lines:
"We have no plans to stop developing World of Warcraft when you reach level 100, as opposed to how some players misinterpreted our previous statement. We just don't feel we want to get to a in many gamers' minds special number in two mere expansion sets."

No, those aren't definitive quotes but exactly what they said in different words. Yes, I know I'm right. No, I can't bother sourcing it - and since you called the first claim to quotation, the burden of proof is on you either way.

Lucky that theres another guy who understood that 100 IS NOT the cap!

[procne]

"The cataclysm level cap is 5 more levels because we want to be able to add more content before level 100."
Does not equal to:
"The cataclysm level cap is 5 more levels because 100 is the last cap and we want to add more content before that."

And since people misunderstood the first statement, blues have also stepped up to reassure something along these lines:
"We have no plans to stop developing World of Warcraft when you reach level 100, as opposed to how some players misinterpreted our previous statement. We just don't feel we want to get to a in many gamers' minds special number in two mere expansion sets."

No, those aren't definitive quotes but exactly what they said in different words. Yes, I know I'm right. No, I can't bother sourcing it - and since you called the first claim to quotation, the burden of proof is on you either way.

all the needed quotes are here:

And so that people who claim "blizz said 100 is the level cap" can finally understand:
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news...oW-Private-Q-A

Someday, WoW may end, but it won't be at level 100 as people are predicting - in fact, Blizzard hasn't even considered it. "There is no planned ending point for WoW at all."

http://www.tentonhammer.com/node/73567

Someone asked me earlier if the reason why we did 5 levels because level 100 is the final cap; did we want to slow that down. We’ve never had a discussion like that.

those are quotes from blizzard employees.