Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ...
3
4
5
6
7
... LastLast
  1. #81
    Pandaren Monk ZeroWashu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,954
    Quote Originally Posted by shadowkras View Post
    They ruined sunken temple, the best (fun) part was the upper area with all the trolls and maze design.
    I was shocked by that change, I loved running Sunken Temple. Is there some new rule in low level dungeon design that says "must be done it fifteen minutes or less"?

  2. #82
    Stood in the Fire valiorik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    446
    Quote Originally Posted by shadowkras View Post
    They ruined sunken temple, the best (fun) part was the upper area with all the trolls and maze design.
    Maze wasn't hard to solve. But it was fun anyway. Game should have some difficult content in low and medium levels, but looks like Blizzard is targeting arcade players lately
    91 lvl Elit Alcoholic Ирез

  3. #83
    Quote Originally Posted by ZEROWASHU View Post
    I was shocked by that change, I loved running Sunken Temple. Is there some new rule in low level dungeon design that says "must be done it fifteen minutes or less"?
    Try to imagine newcomers doing ST, Gnomer, Mara... Hell, I'm playing this for 4 years and still spent 30min going around ST on my 80 for the achievement.

    It's not about "15min or less", more like "less than an hour and without the risk of getting lost and having your group disbanded in sheer frustration".

  4. #84
    The wikia ad placement was screwing up almost all the pages.

    Wowwiki: http://i.imgur.com/3qGho.png

    Wowpedia: http://i.imgur.com/k2QkN.png

  5. #85
    For everyone who's wondering about the songs used in the Millenium video:

    Immediate Music - Rising Empire
    Immediate Music - Imperativa
    Immediate Music - Liberty Shield

  6. #86
    The wikia ad placement was screwing up almost all the pages. You could switch back to the old style but you had to have an account and know where the setting was. Making it bad for just people coming to the site for info. And the layout was going to become permanent with no way to change it back to the old layout on November 3rd.

    Wowwiki: http://i.imgur.com/3qGho.png
    Wowpedia: http://i.imgur.com/k2QkN.png

    Wowwiki: http://www.wowpedia.org/images/a/a0/...oser_Wikia.png
    Wowpedia: http://www.wowpedia.org/images/e/e9/...er_Wowwiki.png

    Another example of the bar on the right completely screwing up the minimap points.
    http://www.wowpedia.org/images/a/aa/...elord_skin.jpg
    Last edited by Guenhwyvaria; 2010-10-26 at 11:20 AM.

  7. #87
    You don't need the goblin and pirate rep at the same time. As evident in my picture below of me getting the feat. It's just since Nelfs can be mages again Shen'dralar can move out of DM and their rep is meaningless. Also bloodsail is probably being seriously changed somehow.

    http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/b.../TheInsane.jpg

  8. #88
    Quote Originally Posted by Hokuto View Post
    Try to imagine newcomers doing ST, Gnomer, Mara... Hell, I'm playing this for 4 years and still spent 30min going around ST on my 80 for the achievement.

    It's not about "15min or less", more like "less than an hour and without the risk of getting lost and having your group disbanded in sheer frustration".
    Yep cause people want their "swift gratification"

  9. #89
    Is there will be any live stream from raid testing? :<

  10. #90
    Quote Originally Posted by Explosion_Rex View Post
    I'm really hoping they stick to there no intrusive ads promise. I'm looking forward to never having to go back to wowwiki again.... but then again, since Curse bought MMO ads have been popping up and yelling at me all the time now, so I won't be surprised if wowpedia gets just as bad.
    Wait, wat? Also, http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...orting-bad-ads

  11. #91

  12. #92
    We can see patchnotes?

    what bugs are fixed?

  13. #93
    Quote Originally Posted by Rivermark View Post
    Wowwiki had ads? Well, I guess AdBlock did it's job flawlessly all these years.
    Thank u so much, i was trying to remember this addon =D

  14. #94
    meh ill still be using wowikki, i dont know whats wrong with you guys thinking it'll be better then wowikki who cares if the ads are annoying?

  15. #95
    Quote Originally Posted by PlzpstGearscore View Post
    meh ill still be using wowikki, i dont know whats wrong with you guys thinking it'll be better then wowikki who cares if the ads are annoying?
    wowpedia and wowwiki have the EXACT same content today, and from the look of it wowpedia has a better chance of being the more updated site (and better layout) in three months time. It seems as most of those who wrote articles on wowwiki now writes on wowpedia. If wowwiki somehow attracts new contributors they can still be relevant, but with no administrators I doubt it. We will see. Worst case scenario, none of the sites stay up to date.

    From what I can tell "wowwiki", as in founders and administrators and the defacto "owners" of the content, have used Wikia as a sort of server host. Wikia owns the domain name and the servers, but they do NOT own the content. They did not run the site, AFAIK. It's hard to talk about ownership of something that is free, hence the quotation marks around "owners".

  16. #96
    Quote Originally Posted by Guenhwyvaria View Post
    The wikia ad placement was screwing up almost all the pages. You could switch back to the old style but you had to have an account and know where the setting was. Making it bad for just people coming to the site for info. And the layout was going to become permanent with no way to change it back to the old layout on November 3rd.

    Wowwiki: http://i.imgur.com/3qGho.png
    Wowpedia: http://i.imgur.com/k2QkN.png

    Wowwiki: http://www.wowpedia.org/images/a/a0/...oser_Wikia.png
    Wowpedia: http://www.wowpedia.org/images/e/e9/...er_Wowwiki.png

    Another example of the bar on the right completely screwing up the minimap points.
    http://www.wowpedia.org/images/a/aa/...elord_skin.jpg
    They left over THAT?????? Really???? If it had been over something big like using purple vs light purple. I think they got a crit on an overreact.

    Wowwiki is very useful and informative. I hope everything works out with the move.

  17. #97
    Firefox + adblock extension + noscript extension= no adds
    Btw, on my firefox mmo-champion dont have any add even curse.com logo on bottom is removed... in my eyes adblock and noscript programers are gods

  18. #98
    Mechagnome Lausten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Aalborg - Denmark
    Posts
    535
    Okay so uhm.. Im over halfway done with Insane in the Membrane.. I need Ravenholdt (11999/12k), and Darkmoon Faire (100 Decks or so).. Am I able to get those in Cataclysm? Or have all of my time invested in this Feat of Strength been wasted?

  19. #99
    High Overlord DuoandKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    146
    i liked the video of paragon showing the different sides of the fight just not the tank. Also i liked the sunken before cause of dankness lol but being i just brought a pally tank though there im glad its alot shorter than before!

  20. #100
    Quote Originally Posted by genericpeter View Post
    yay, wowwiki was becoming overly outdated, looking forward to the changes.
    And hopefully it's going to look better - wowwiki looked like shit. Light colored letters on a dark background? What idiot did that. (And don't say change the themes, most pages became invisible if you tried to change the theme, since the colors were hardcoded to ignore the theme)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •