Disc vs. holy; The final vote!

[PSG32095]

So in my guild we have about 15 priests (mains or otherwise) and we can't agree on what is better, Holy or Disc. Because of all this debates I want to see what the wow community thinks! So cast your vote!

[harky]

Anyway, PSG, the reason they can't agree is because they all have different ideas about what makes a spec better than another. Is it maximum output? Is it mana regen? Is it PVP? Is it 'fun'? Is it ease of use? I can't answer one way or the other personally. I find Discipline more fun, but Holy's output is too much higher. *shrug* You're not going to get a very definitive answer anywhere you ask.

[Aiurwyn]

I always feel sad playing Disc because everything but shield and Fheal is so much weaker than when I am holy. Give me Holy any day of the week.

[kel]

disc was on top so easyer to vote for

[AetherMcLoud]

What WILL be better in cataclysm? Noone can tell right now really, but as a personal opinion holy looks a lot more fun than disc in cataclysm.

What WAS better in wrath? Disc without a doubt. Holy might have had a few hope spots in some ulduar fights, but overall disc was the way to go. Disc was needed for LK kills before the buff, disc was THE priest pvp spec, and no other healer could do what disc could do (preventing huge bursts of damage upon the raid) so they were kinda special.

[PlatedPriest]

i prefer disc over holy.
my main is an holy paladin. dont get me wrong i respect holy priest but there is to much going on imo

[Keristrasza]

I have been holy since Vanilla, Disc to me is boring with to many shield gimmicks over actual healing. It "may" be better but to me its less fun over all so I say holy.