Post your gaming setup!

[BicycleMafioso]

It's not that he's "jelly" about your old system running that, it's that we get annoyed when people come in here and make untrue claims, which in turn lead the community to think something different than is actually true.

Why the hostility? (to all of you, I just happened to reach Fuzzy's quote-button first. This is not directed toward him personally) Most people don't realise that resolution matter.

AFAIK (too lazy to go back and check) he didn't mention that he plays in full ultra and at 1080p, just that he got X fps.

[Deleted]

if its too big, would a moderator make it smaller cause im too retarded to do it apparently.


Mouse: Razer Naga
Mouse pad: Razer Goliathus
Keyboard: Razer Lycosa
Speakers: Logitech Z4
Microphone: just a cheap logitech table mic.
Screen: Acer something old.
Computer: Sony Vaio VPCF12S1E

[DeltrusDisc]

if its too big, would a moderator make it smaller cause im too retarded to do it apparently.


Mouse: Razer Naga
Mouse pad: Razer Goliathus
Keyboard: Razer Lycosa
Speakers: Logitech Z4
Microphone: just a cheap logitech table mic.
Screen: Acer something old.
Computer: Sony Vaio VPCF12S1E

You uploaded from imageshack, they have a "thumbnail" selection.

[Tic Tacs]

I'm done here, too much ignorance. I think even Blizzard would agree with everything I posted here:

The minimum system requirements for World of Warcraft are:


Windows XP 32bit (SP3), Windows XP 64bit (SP2), Windows Vista 32bit (SP1), Windows Vista 64bit (SP1):

• Intel Pentium 4 1.3 GHz or AMD Athlon XP 1500
• 1GB or more of RAM
• NVIDIA® GeForce® FX or ATI Radeon™ 9500 video card or better
• DirectX-compatible sound card or motherboard sound capability
• 25 GB free hard drive space
• A keyboard and mouse are required. Input devices other than a mouse and keyboard are not supported
• You must have an active broadband Internet connection to play

[Asmekiel]

Why the hostility? (to all of you, I just happened to reach Fuzzy's quote-button first. This is not directed toward him personally) Most people don't realise that resolution matter.

AFAIK (too lazy to go back and check) he didn't mention that he plays in full ultra and at 1080p, just that he got X fps.

It's just like you said, most people don't realise. In this case most people don't realise that, when claiming to have X FPS, that other people want to know at what resolution and quality settings. If they don't mention this we all assume they run at Ultra settings except shadows, 2x or 4x MSAA and 1920x1080 or higher, while being in a 25m raidfight.

I'm done here, too much ignorance. I think even Blizzard would agree with everything I posted here:

The minimum system requirements for World of Warcraft are:


Windows XP 32bit (SP3), Windows XP 64bit (SP2), Windows Vista 32bit (SP1), Windows Vista 64bit (SP1):

• Intel Pentium 4 1.3 GHz or AMD Athlon XP 1500
• 1GB or more of RAM
• NVIDIA® GeForce® FX or ATI Radeon™ 9500 video card or better
• DirectX-compatible sound card or motherboard sound capability
• 25 GB free hard drive space
• A keyboard and mouse are required. Input devices other than a mouse and keyboard are not supported
• You must have an active broadband Internet connection to play

You do realise that those are for 1024x768 for medium+ settings and not even for in-raid. That CPU will not be able to hold up in 25m raids.

[Drunkenvalley]

Silly question, Tic Tacs... what settings are you running the game at?

Btw, minimum system requirements yield very, very low FPS. What they'll call "playable" can be absolutely pathetic.

[Drunkenvalley]

Would just like to point out that Blizzard did in 4.x lower the spell-details of other players (with options to change it) IIRC, and spell effects can be absolute murder on many computers.

[DeltrusDisc]

I'm done here, too much ignorance. I think even Blizzard would agree with everything I posted here:

The minimum system requirements for World of Warcraft are:


Windows XP 32bit (SP3), Windows XP 64bit (SP2), Windows Vista 32bit (SP1), Windows Vista 64bit (SP1):

• Intel Pentium 4 1.3 GHz or AMD Athlon XP 1500
• 1GB or more of RAM
• NVIDIA® GeForce® FX or ATI Radeon™ 9500 video card or better
• DirectX-compatible sound card or motherboard sound capability
• 25 GB free hard drive space
• A keyboard and mouse are required. Input devices other than a mouse and keyboard are not supported
• You must have an active broadband Internet connection to play

I notice you edited out the "too much ignorance *WITH ZERO BRAIN POWER*" part. Very smooth buddy, but I caught that in my email, it goes to show how near-sighted you are. If any of us had zero brain power, we wouldn't be here on these forums now would we, you.... just, wow. Heh.

Also, those MINIMUM system requirements are NOT for the graphics settings you're bullshitting about all over these forums, they are for an "okay gaming experience at low graphics settings." Seriously, if anyone is the ignorant one, it is you.

And lol, Blizz agree with what you've said, no they would laugh you out.

[oddf3llow]

Windows Vista 64bit
Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ stock 2.4GHz
Gigabyte G31M-S2L mATX motherboard
4GB Team Elite DDR2 800
Zotac GeForce GTS 450 1GB
Asus XONAR DX (pcie)
2x SATAII HDD's (300GB and 200GB. No raid or anything)
Razer NAGA mouse
Logitech keyboard
24" HP LCD monitor @1920x1080
Creative Fatal1ty gaming heaset (NOT USB!)

Had this system for a good while now. Runs okay on ultra, but with 2xAA and shadows turned down to 1 notch from bottom.

I do get occasional frame rate issues since getting the 1920x1080 monitor. Nothing game breaking, but noticeable stuttering as I dip into the 20's. I'm probably pushing the limits of the GTS 450. I "upgraded" from an HD3870, but after doing some calculations, I'm pretty sure the 3870 actually had more raw fill rate and definitely more memory bandwidth. Since WoW is not heavily shader dependent, I may have actually been better off sticking with the older card now that I'm running at a much higher resolution than I used to.

[Asera]

Windows Vista 64bit
Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ stock 2.4GHz
Gigabyte G31M-S2L mATX motherboard
4GB Team Elite DDR2 800
Zotac GeForce GTS 450 1GB
Asus XONAR DX (pcie)
2x SATAII HDD's (300GB and 200GB. No raid or anything)
Razer NAGA mouse
Logitech keyboard
24" HP LCD monitor @1920x1080
Creative Fatal1ty gaming heaset (NOT USB!)

Had this system for a good while now. Runs okay on ultra, but with 2xAA and shadows turned down to 1 notch from bottom.

I do get occasional frame rate issues since getting the 1920x1080 monitor. Nothing game breaking, but noticeable stuttering as I dip into the 20's. I'm probably pushing the limits of the GTS 450. I "upgraded" from an HD3870, but after doing some calculations, I'm pretty sure the 3870 actually had more raw fill rate and definitely more memory bandwidth. Since WoW is not heavily shader dependent, I may have actually been better off sticking with the older card now that I'm running at a much higher resolution than I used to.

This is Tic Tacs if he had a clue. xD

(Not insulting you, mr poster)

[LegitHunter]

http://i.imgur.com/HVabA.jpg
Imac 27inch i5 with 5750
Razer Blackwidow
Razer Naga
Razer Carchias
Ipad2 in the corner

[DeltrusDisc]

<MAJOR SNIP>
Imac 27inch i5 with 5750
Razer Blackwidow
Razer Naga
Razer Carchias
Ipad2 in the corner

Your pic is WAAAYYYYYY too big. I suggest deleting it out and just providing link. In fact here we are. :P

http://i.imgur.com/HVabA.jpg
Or thumbnail.

[sizzlinsauce]

beast setup aye? 2gb of ram a 2400pro radeon card, and a sexy 18" screen off a laptop with 2000mb of hdd

[DeltrusDisc]

beast setup aye? 2gb of ram a 2400pro radeon card, and a sexy 18" screen off a laptop with 2000mb of hdd

Are those stats correct? And is that stuff actually hooked up? O_o

[Icpie]

beast setup aye? 2gb of ram a 2400pro radeon card, and a sexy 18" screen off a laptop with 2000mb of hdd

MacGyver? O.O

Obligatory message b/c mine's too short :x

[Cyanotical]

Dude I posted my graphics setting and fps several times. If you jelly about my old system running World of Warcraft perfectly please take it elsewhere.

It's 1680x1050 on 22'' monitor. Yes, again if you want to spend extra $400 on monitor for marginal difference, you go ahead. I'll stick around with something more practical.

As I stated in my last post, I will do more in-combat screenshots on Monday.

Also, I'm buying new system this winter for upcoming mmorpgs. If you are seriously interested in buying my current one pst with offer. I will provide more info.

it more of a issue with what is known, setups close to yours are very well known, and they are well known to not perform as well as you are saying

It's not that he's "jelly" about your old system running that, it's that we get annoyed when people come in here and make untrue claims, which in turn lead the community to think something different than is actually true.

one of my hdds has a max throughput of around 6300MB/s

[BicycleMafioso]

one of my hdds has a max throughput of around 6300MB/s

What a coincidence. My aunt is JFK. :O

So. Guys. Now that we know what everyone have - What will the next thing you get be?
I will add two screens next.

[georgevonfranken]

So. Guys. Now that we know what everyone have - What will the next thing you get be?

Probably a case, fans, and gpu whenever keplar comes out

[Asera]

What a coincidence. My aunt is JFK. :O

So. Guys. Now that we know what everyone have - What will the next thing you get be?
I will add two screens next.

23" IPS panel is incoming for me. Next part will probably be... well... I don't know. I think my system is fairly well rounded now...

Actually, I'll probably replace the Soundblaster XFi I've had since my Athlon 64 3200+.

[Cyanotical]

What a coincidence. My aunt is JFK. :O

So. Guys. Now that we know what everyone have - What will the next thing you get be?
I will add two screens next.

http://i.imgur.com/r0jZa.jpg
probably 3 new monitors, although, im kinda waiting for a good 27" IPS 120hz that is VESA compatible to come out