There is still equipment on the moon you can see with a telescope and no camera in the 1960s had the capability to fake such a hoax:
http://gizmodo.com/5977205/why-the-m...finitive-proof
There is still equipment on the moon you can see with a telescope and no camera in the 1960s had the capability to fake such a hoax:
http://gizmodo.com/5977205/why-the-m...finitive-proof
Putin khuliyo
This is not quite true. You can see the natrually formed valley where they worked on the moon, however the equipment left behind is so small in comparison, that it was only in 2011 that an luna orbiting satellite (LRO) was able to spot the equipment.
sourceOriginally Posted by Space.com
Using the right command in the wrong environment... As root:
While we're talking about the moon landing...
Thought it could be cool to post our desk and pc setups, does anyone have one messier than mine after a weekends gaming? :P
is that barbecue sauce? thought I was the only one that kept that at my desk
/\ Was this sarcasm? Are you sure?
|| Read it again, I'll wait.
|| The results may surprise you.
Didn't know what "bertstare" meant. This became a lot more funny once I Googled it.
Last edited by Ciddy; 2015-07-07 at 04:19 AM.
Yes, this is the real cover of Germany's top financial newspaper:
The Economist:
Last edited by mmoc83df313720; 2015-07-07 at 02:41 PM.